A systematic review of mental health in rural Andean populations in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic
View/ Open
Download
(application/pdf: 629.9Kb)
(application/pdf: 629.9Kb)
Date
2023-08-17Author(s)
Moya-Salazar, Jeel
Jaime-Quispe, Alexis
Cañari, Betsy
Moya-Espinoza, Jeel G.
Contreras-Pulache, Hans
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
“Background: COVID-19 has been causing mental health problems around the
world, with rural and indigenous peoples likely to be the most aected. This
systematic review synthesizes and critically analyzes the existing literature on
mental disorders in the rural Andean population in Latin America.
Methods: A systematic review with narrative synthesis was carried out following
the PRISMA guidelines. We searched nine databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus,
EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scielo, LILACS, and Latindex),
five public prepublication servers (SocArXiv, medRxiv, bioRxiv, SportRXiv, and
Preprints), ALICIA, and Google Scholar for articles that included the analysis of
mental health problems using data collected from the rural Andean population
in Latin America. These were eligible for inclusion. Articles that included NonLatin American populations (including European or African migrants) and studies
conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (since the declaration of national
lockdown) were excluded.
Results: A total of 23,761 articles were retrieved, 14 of which met the inclusion
requirements. Most were cross-sectional (n = 12) and related to anxiety (n = 9),
depression (n = 8), and stress (n = 5). The mental health analysis of 5,976 rural
dwellers from four countries in Latin America also included gray literature studies
(n = 7) that allowed the quantification of mental health problems in adults (n = 7)
and adolescents/children (n = 4). Only one study was multinational, and the quality
of publications varied. Despite the high frequency of anxiety, depression, and stress
symptoms among rural Latin American populations during COVID-19, published
research is very limited. This review found preliminary evidence that the frequency
of anxiety (45%), depression (27.6%), and stress (33.1%) in the rural population
was associated with pandemic restrictions across countries. Measures of other
psychiatric problems, such as distress or suicidal ideation, cannot be estimated.
Conclusion: Regional-wide studies investigating changes in the frequency of
symptoms of mental health problems in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
are warranted to inform culturally adapted prevention strategies. This study is
limited to a narrative synthesis and may be subject to publication bia“
Collections
- SCOPUS [380]