Citation: de Lima, S.L.S.; Pereira, F.S.; de Lima, R.B.; de Freitas, I.C.; Spadotto, J.; Connolly, B.J.; Barreto, J.; Stavale, F.; Vitorino, H.A.; Fajardo, H.V.; et al. MnO2-Ir Nanowires: Combining Ultrasmall Nanoparticle Sizes, O-Vacancies, and Low Noble-Metal Loading with Improved Activities towards the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/nano12173039 Academic Editor: Shiqi Zhou Received: 17 July 2022 Accepted: 16 August 2022 Published: 1 September 2022 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affil- iations. Copyright: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). nanomaterials Article MnO2-Ir Nanowires: Combining Ultrasmall Nanoparticle Sizes, O-Vacancies, and Low Noble-Metal Loading with Improved Activities towards the Oxygen Reduction Reaction Scarllett L. S. de Lima 1, Fellipe S. Pereira 2, Roberto B. de Lima 2, Isabel C. de Freitas 3, Julio Spadotto 4, Brian J. Connolly 4, Jade Barreto 5 , Fernando Stavale 5, Hector A. Vitorino 6 , Humberto V. Fajardo 7, Auro A. Tanaka 2 , Marco A. S. Garcia 2,* and Anderson G. M. da Silva 1,* 1 Departamento de Engenharia Química e de Materiais-DEQM, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Rua Marquês de São Vicente, 225 Gávea, Rio de Janeiro 22453-900, RJ, Brazil 2 Departamento de Química, Centro de Ciências Exatas e Tecnologias, Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA), Av. dos Portugueses, 1966 Vila Bacanga, São Luís 65080-805, MA, Brazil 3 Departamento de Química Fundamental, Instituto de Química, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 748, São Paulo 05508-000, SP, Brazil 4 Department of Materials, Henry Royce Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK 5 Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas, Rio de Janeiro 22290-180, RJ, Brazil 6 South American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima 15108, Peru 7 Departamento de Química, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Campus Morro do Cruzeiro, Ouro Preto 35400-000, MG, Brazil * Correspondence: marco.suller@ufma.br (M.A.S.G.); agms@puc-rio.br (A.G.M.d.S.) Abstract: Although clean energy generation utilizing the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) can be considered a promising strategy, this approach remains challenging by the dependence on high loadings of noble metals, mainly Platinum (Pt). Therefore, efforts have been directed to develop new and efficient electrocatalysts that could decrease the Pt content (e.g., by nanotechnology tools or alloying) or replace them completely in these systems. The present investigation shows that high catalytic activity can be reached towards the ORR by employing 1.8 ± 0.7 nm Ir nanoparticles (NPs) deposited onto MnO2 nanowires surface under low Ir loadings (1.2 wt.%). Interestingly, we observed that the MnO2-Ir nanohybrid presented high catalytic activity for the ORR close to commercial Pt/C (20.0 wt.% of Pt), indicating that it could obtain efficient performance using a simple synthetic procedure. The MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst also showed improved stability relative to commercial Pt/C, in which only a slight activity loss was observed after 50 reaction cycles. Considering our findings, the superior performance delivered by the MnO2-Ir nanohybrid may be related to (i) the significant concentration of reduced Mn3+ species, leading to increased concentration of oxygen vacancies at its surface; (ii) the presence of strong metal-support interactions (SMSI), in which the electronic effect between MnOx and Ir may enhance the ORR process; and (iii) the unique structure comprised by Ir ultrasmall sizes at the nanowire surface that enable the exposure of high energy surface/facets, high surface-to-volume ratios, and their uniform dispersion. Keywords: manganese dioxide; nanowires; iridium; ORR; low metal loading 1. Introduction The increasing energy demand, reinforcement of actions for the global warming struggle, rising energy prices due to population growth, and daily power consumption are worrisome [1,2]. Moreover, the depletion of fossil fuel reserves to meet energy requirements is in the spotlight due to energy security worries and political issues [3]. Thus, much effort is currently being dedicated globally to developing cleaner and renewable energy technologies [4,5]. In this scenario, fuel cells, in which ORR is the reaction occurring at the Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12173039 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 2 of 14 cathode, are considered clean and renewable electrical energy generators with potential for future applications [3,6]. In general, ORR mainly occurs through two pathways, one involving the transfer of two electrons (2e− ORR), producing H2O2, and the other consisting of the transfer of four electrons (4e− ORR), yielding H2O as the product [7,8]. The latter is desirable for practical applications since the 4e− ORR rate is faster and can provide higher energy conversion efficiency [6,8]. Therefore, developing electrocatalysts to undergo this pathway is critical for the optimal electrochemical performance of fuel cells. However, the ORR limits the performance of many electrochemical devices due to its sluggish kinetics, which results in considerable overpotentials, causing a significant loss in energy efficiency; thus, the design of transition metal-based nanomaterials is highly widespread. Although Pt- based electrocatalysts’ low abundance and high cost prevent large-scale implementation on emergent energy conversion devices, they are the most effective cathodes for ORR [9,10]. Therefore, it is essential to develop alternative electrocatalysts with high catalytic activity, availability, and low cost. Manganese dioxide (MnO2) is a promising candidate as an electrocatalyst for ORR because, in addition to the low cost associated with the abundance in the form of natural ores, it has environmental compatibility, low toxicity, and variable oxidation states [11]. However, its major limitation is the low electronic conductivity, which is unfavorable for rapid electron transfer during the electrochemical process [12]. To overcome this limitation, researchers have focused on manipulating the MnO2 physicochemical features by controlling its size, shape, composition, and structure (α-, β-, γ-MnO2). In this case, it has been demonstrated that controlling the nanoparticle size and shape (e.g., nanocubes, nanorods, nanowires) strongly affects their properties, making nanoparticle shape-control an efficient strategy for maximizing performance [13]. Furthermore, one-dimensional (1D) MnO2 nanowires are especially interesting for ORR due to their (i) higher specific surface areas relative to those of commercial supports, (ii) crystal growth along highly catalytically active crystallographic directions, and (iii) surface, which is easily accessible by gas and liquid substrates due to porosity [14]. A strategy to solve the MnO2 low electronic conductivity is to deposit small amounts (<2.0 wt.%) of some transition metals. Among them, iridium (Ir) can be considered a promising candidate due to its higher availability than Pt, lower costs, and suitable ac- tivities for the ORR [15,16]. However, although some examples have demonstrated that pure Ir-based catalysts or MnO2 nanomaterials may be auspicious alternatives for ORR, separately [12,17], they still have several limitations, and deeper investigations by coupling MnO2 and Ir are missing in recent literature. This paper describes the catalytic activity of MnO2 nanowires decorated with ul- trasmall Ir nanoparticles (NPs) (NPs having diameters of 2–3 nm or less) towards the ORR. Owing to their unique 1D morphology comprised of ultrasmall NPs, we found that the MnO2–Ir NPs displayed comparable catalytic performances under low Ir loadings (1.2 wt.%) relative to commercial 20.0 wt.% Pt/C. Interestingly, the MnO2–Ir NPs were synthesized by a facile approach based on utilizing MnO2 nanowires as physical templates for Ir deposition without any prior surface modification/functionalization steps, as several immobilization processes over oxides require [18,19]. This method enabled the uniform deposition of monodisperse NPs over the entire surface of the support (MnO2). 2. Experimental Section 2.1. Materials and Instrumentation The analytical-grade chemicals manganese sulfate monohydrate (MnSO4·H2O, 99%, Sigma- Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), potassium permanganate (KMnO4, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA, M.W. 55,000 g/mol), ethylene glycol (EG, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), sodium borohydride (NaBH4, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), Pt/C (Pt on Vulcan XC-72, E-TEK), Vulcan XC-72 (E-TEK, Milan, Italy), and Iridium(III) chloride Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 3 of 14 hydrate (IrCl3·xH2O, 99.8%, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as received. All solutions were prepared using deionized water (18.2 MΩ cm). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using an LEO 440 SEM operated at 5 kV. Four transmission electron microscopes (TEM) were used during this investigation, including: a HITACHI HT 7800 TEM (Tokyo, Japan) operated at 120 kV and a Tecnai FEI G20 TEM, a Jeol ARM 200F TEM, and FEI TALOS F200A with an X-FEG and SuperX (4 SDDs), operated at 200 kV. The nanomaterials for TEM analysis (Tecnai FEI G20, Hillsboro, OR, USA and HITACHI HT 7800 microscopes, Tokyo, Japan) were prepared by a drop-casting approach, in which the NPs suspension diluted in water was deposited over a carbon-coated Tecnai FEI copper grid, followed by drying under ambient conditions. The nanomaterials for high- resolution (HR)TEM and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), and X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS) analysis (Jeol ARM, microscope, and FEI TALOS F200A, Hillsboro, OR, USA) were prepared by making a suspension containing the NPs in isopropanol, followed by their ultrasonic agitation and a drop spread on a TEM Cu grid covered with an amorphous holey lacey film. In the present study, STEM-XED spectrum image datasets were acquired with a dwell time of 100 µs per pixel and a total acquisition time of 900 s. All Talos STEM-XEDS data were processed using Velox 2.3 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with theoretical k-factors. Textural characteristics for the electrocatalysts were determined from nitrogen adsorp- tion isotherms, recorded at a relative pressure range of 0.07 < P/Po < 0.3. The Barrett-Joyner– Halenda (BJH) method determined the average pore diameter from the N2 desorption isotherms. BET measurements were made in triplicate. The samples’ crystalline structure was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Rigaku-Miniflex II diffractometer in a 2θ range from 10 to 75◦ performed at 1◦. Before the H2-TPR measurements, the samples were heat-treated at 200 ◦C for 30 min under N2 flow to remove moisture adsorbed. After cooling to room temperature, the reduction gas of 8.0% H2/N2 at a flow rate of 20 mL/min was introduced, and the temperature was raised linearly to 950 ◦C at a heating rate of 10 [20–31] Using Spectro Arcos equipment, the Ir atomic percentages were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). For ICP-OES, the MnO2 powder samples were fixed on stainless steel holders using double adhesive carbon tape. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) chamber with a base pressure of 5 × 10−10 mbar equipped with a SPECS analyzer PHOIBOS 150. XPS spectra were acquired using a monochromatic Al-Kα X-ray radiation source (hν = 1486.6 eV). The chemical analyses of the corresponding peak components were performed using CASA software using Shirley-type background and Mn 2p and 3s, and Ir 4f regions line shapes of standard Gaussian–Lorentzian (GL) and Functional Lorentzian (LF), respectively. Direct analysis of the O 1s region was not explored due to the presence of adventitious carbon and Cl, N, and K species related to the precursors on the sample surface. The survey and high-resolution spectra were obtained using energy passes (Epass) of 50 and 20 eV, respectively. The spectrometer was previously calibrated using a clean Ag (111) single-crystal with Ag 3d5/2 peak position at 368.4 eV and energy resolution given by 0.6 eV. We have not observed any significant charging effect for the MnO2 samples. Moreover, each obtained spectrum was calibrated, referencing the adventitious carbon binding energy given by 284.8 eV. 2.2. Synthesis of MnO2 Nanowires A hydrothermal approach obtained the MnO2 nanowires [20]. In a typical procedure, 0.4 g of MnSO4·H2O and 1.0 g of KMnO4 were dissolved in 30 mL of deionized water. This solution was transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was heated and stirred at 140 ◦C for 19 h and then allowed to cool down to room temperature [14]. The nanowires were washed three times with ethanol (15 mL) and three times with water (15 mL) by successive rounds of centrifugation and removal of the supernatant and finally dried at 80 ◦C for 6 h in air. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 4 of 14 2.3. Synthesis of MnO2 Nanowires Decorated with Ir NPs (MnO2–Ir NPs) Typically, 40 mg of MnO2 nanowires and 13 mg of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) were added to 10 mL of EG. The obtained suspension was transferred to a 25 mL round-bottom flask and kept under vigorous stirring at 90 ◦C for 20 min. Then, 1 mL of a 120 mM NaBH4(aq) and 2 mL of a 24 mM IrCl3−(aq) solutions were sequentially added to the reaction flask. This mixture was kept under vigorous stirring for another 1 h to produce MnO2–Ir NPs, washed three times with ethanol (15 mL) and water (15 mL) by successive rounds of centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 5 min and removal of the supernatant. After washing, the MnO2–Ir NPs were suspended in 40 mL of water. The same procedure was used to prepare the Ir/C (Vulcan XC-72) electrocatalyst. 2.4. Electrochemical Studies Electrochemical experiments for ORR were performed in a conventional three-electrode cell using a PGSTAT 302 N (Autolab) potentiostat/galvanostat model controlled by Nova 2.0 soft- ware and the electrode rotation rate by a Pine ASR rotator. A 0.1 mol L−1 potassium hydroxide (KOH) solution was used as the electrolyte, modified glassy carbon as the working electrode, a platinum wire as the counter electrode, and saturated AgCl/KCl as the reference electrode. A total of 20 µL of paint (mixed solution containing 5 mg of the material of interest, 1 mg of methanol with 0.1 mL of Nafion® 5.0% by weight, and 1.4 mL of deionized water, dispersed by ultrasound for 10 min) was used to modify the surface of the glassy carbon electrode. The curves for the oxygen reduction reaction were recorded using the rotating disk electrode (RDE) with different rotation rates, and the electrolyte was saturated with O2. All tests were performed at room temperature. The catalytic activity for the ORR in alkaline solution was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry (CV), linear scanning voltammetry (LSV), and RDE techniques. The prepared catalyst was compared to Pt/C commercial electrocatalysts. The characteristic LSVs obtained using the RDE were described by the Koutecky– Levich (K-L) equation. Considering a first-order kinetics according to the dissolved oxygen, the K-L equation describes the disc current of an RDE system. In that case, the currents are related to the following equation: 1 i = 1 ik + 1 id where ik is the kinetic current and id is the diffusion limiting current, given by: id = 0.20nFAD2/3C0ν−1/6ω1/2 = nBω1/2 where F is 96,485 C mol−1, n is the number of electrons in the overall reaction, A is the disc area (~0.2 cm2), D is the diffusion coefficient of O2 (1.76 × 10−5 cm2 s−1), C0 is the solubility of O2 (1.103 × 10−6 mol L−1), υ is the kinematic viscosity (1.01 × 10−2 cm2 s−1), and ω is the rotation rate in revolutions per minute (rpm). Thus, a straight-line plot of 1/I vs. 1/ √ ω for various potentials provides intercepts corresponding to ik, and the slopes yield the B values. The electrochemically active surface area (EAS) was performed as follows: the sample was saturated with carbon monoxide by bubbling the gas for 5 min at−0.50 V vs. Ag/AgCl (sat). After that, the solution (0.1 mol L−1 KOH) was purged for 10 min using N2 to remove CO from the solution. The CO monolayer was oxidized by applying two scans at 25 mVs−1 in the potential range of −0.5–0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl (sat). 3. Results and Discussion Our studies started by synthesizing MnO2 nanowires through a hydrothermal ap- proach. The procedure afforded well-defined nanostructures of 34 ± 5 nm in width and >1 µm in length (Figure 1A). In sequence, the MnO2 nanowires were directly employed as physical templates for the nucleation and growth of Ir NPs on their surface without Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 5 of 14 needing any surface modification/functionalization steps. We used IrCl3−(aq) as a metallic precursor, PVP as a stabilizer, BH4−(aq) as a reducing agent, and EG as a solvent. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 14 various potentials provides intercepts corresponding to ik, and the slopes yield the B values. The electrochemically active surface area (EAS) was performed as follows: the sample was saturated with carbon monoxide by bubbling the gas for 5 min at −0.50 V vs. Ag/AgCl (sat). After that, the solution (0.1 mol L−1 KOH) was purged for 10 min using N2 to remove CO from the solution. The CO monolayer was oxidized by applying two scans at 25 mVs−1 in the potential range of −0.5–0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl(sat). 3. Results and Discussion Our studies started by synthesizing MnO2 nanowires through a hydrothermal approach. The procedure afforded well-defined nanostructures of 34 ± 5 nm in width and >1 μm in length (Figure 1A). In sequence, the MnO2 nanowires were directly employed as physical templates for the nucleation and growth of Ir NPs on their surface without ee i ification/ t . e used IrCl3−(aq) as a etal ic r 4−(aq) as a reducing agent, and EG as a solvent. Figure 1. SEM images of MnO2 nanowires: (A) and MnO2-Ir nanowires (B); TEM (C,D); and HRTEM (E,F) of MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst. Fig re 1. SE images of n 2 nanowires: (A) and MnO2-Ir nanowires (B); TEM (C,D); and HRTE ( , ) f 2-Ir electrocatalyst. Figure 1B–F shows SEM (Figure 1B), TEM (Figure 1C,D), and HRTEM (Figure 1E,F) images of the ultrasmall Ir NPs deposited on MnO2 nanowires. A uniform distribution of monodisperse ultrasmall NPs with a narrow size distribution all over the nanowires’ surface can be observed, as shown by the histogram displayed in Figure S1 (particles’ size of 1.8 ± 0.7 nm). The HRTEM images of individual ultrasmall Ir NP at the MnO2 surface (Figure S2) show that the Ir NPs were single-crystalline bounded by {111} facets of Ir fcc structure. High-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-STEM images and STEM-XEDS analyses were performed to investigate further the structure and Mn, O, and Ir elemental distributions in the MnO2 decorated with Ir NPs, as shown in Figure 2. Bright-field STEM (Figure 2A–C) and HAADF-STEM (Figure 2D–F) images illustrate the uniform distribution of ultrasmall Ir NPs at the MnO2 nanowires support. No significant agglomeration was detected, which often leads to detrimental catalytic properties. In addition, STEM-EDS elemental mapping (Figure 2G–I) confirmed the uniform deposition of ultrasmall Ir NPs Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 6 of 14 over the outer surface of the MnO2 nanowires. No morphological changes in the nanowire shape could be detected after Ir NPs deposition. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 14 Figure 1B–F shows SEM (Figure 1B), TEM (Figure 1C,D), and HRTEM (Figure 1E,F) images of the ultrasmall Ir NPs deposited on MnO2 nanowires. A uniform distribution of monodisperse ultrasmall NPs with a narrow size distribution all over the nanowires’ surface can be observed, as shown by the histogram displayed in Figure S1 (particles’ size of 1.8 ± 0.7 nm). The HRTEM images of individual ultrasmall Ir NP at the MnO2 surface (Figure S2) show that the Ir NPs were single-crystalline bounded by {111} facets of Ir fcc structure. High-angle annular dark field (HAADF)-STEM images and STEM-XEDS analyses were performed to investigate further the structure and Mn, O, and Ir elemental distributions in the MnO2 decorated with Ir NPs, as shown in Figure 2. Bright-field STEM (Figure 2A–C) and HAADF-STEM (Figure 2D–F) images illustrate the uniform distribution of ultrasmall Ir NPs at the MnO2 nanowires support. No significant agglomeration was detected, which often leads to detrimental catalytic properties. In addition, STEM-EDS elemental mapping (Figure 2G–I) confirmed the uniform deposition f ultrasmall Ir NPs over the outer surfac of the MnO2 nanowires. No morphol gical c nges in the nanowire shape could be detected after Ir NPs deposition. Figure 2. (A–C) BF-STEM, (D–F) HAADF-STEM, and (G–I) STEM-EDS maps of Mn (red, G), O (green, H), and Ir (yellow, I) of the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst. , , , , , I) of the n 2 t l t. Then, we focused on investigating how the textural, morphological, electronic, and catalytic performances may vary after reducing ultrasmall Ir NPs at the nanowires’ surface. The textural properties of MnO2 and MnO2 decorated with Ir NPs obtained by Brunauer– Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis are shown in Table S1. The specific surface area values for the MnO2-Ir nanowires were slightly higher than that of the MnO2 nanowires (130 ± 4 vs. 123 ± 6 m2/g) due to the intrinsic high surface area of ultrasmall Ir NPs. ICP-OES analyses performed for the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst indicated 1.2 wt.% of Ir loading. The X-ray diffractograms of MnO2 and MnO2-Ir nanowires (Figure 3A) presented typical reflections assigned to the (100), (200), (310), (211), (301), (411), and (600) planes of α-MnO2 (with following lattice constants: a = 9.7847 Å, c = 2.8630 Å, JCPDS 44-0141). No peaks assigned to fcc Ir could be detected, agreeing with their ultrasmall sizes and low loadings in the sample. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 7 of 14 Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 of 14 Then, we focused on investigating how the textural, morphological, electronic, and catalytic performances may vary after reducing ultrasmall Ir NPs at the nanowires’ surface. The textural properties of MnO2 and MnO2 decorated with Ir NPs obtained by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis are shown in Table S1. The specific surface area values for the MnO2-Ir nanowires were slightly higher than that of the MnO2 nanowires (130 ± 4 vs. 123 ± 6 m2/g) due to the intrinsic high surface area of ultrasmall Ir NPs. ICP- OES analyses performed for the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst indicated 1.2 wt.% of Ir loading. The X-ray diffractograms of MnO2 and MnO2-Ir nanowires (Figure 3A) presented typical reflections assigned to the (100), (200), (310), (211), (301), (411), and (600) planes of α-MnO2 (with following lattice constants: a = 9.7847 Å, c = 2.8630 Å, JCPDS 44-0141). No peaks assigned to fcc Ir could be detected, agreeing with their ultrasmall sizes and low loadings in the sample. Figure 3. (A) XRD patterns and (B) TPR profiles of α-MnO2 nanowires before and after the deposition of ultrasmall Ir NPs. Due to metal-support interactions, the deposition of noble metals over MnO2 has been an efficient strategy for improving electrocatalytic performances.[21,22] Moreover, metal NPs may interact/cooperate with metal oxides to facilitate catalytic reactions, in which the reducibility of the inorganic matrix usually represents a key element over the detected catalytic activities.[23,24] To further provide in-depth information into these features, the ultrasmall Ir NPs decorated onto MnO2 nanowires by hydrogen temperature- programmed reduction was investigated, as shown in Figure 3B. Typically, the MnO2 reduction process to MnO can be divided into two reduction stages with Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 as intermediates.[25,26]. Interestingly, the TPR profile for MnO2 nanowires indicates an intense and main reduction peak, centered at 337 °C, which can be assigned to the reduction of Mn4+ to Mn3+. Furthermore, a shoulder around 340 °C was observed and is related to the reduction of Mn3+ into Mn2+. These two almost overlapped reduction peaks suggest the coexistence of Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 intermediates, corresponding to the combined reduction of MnO2/Mn2O3 into Mn3O4 and Mn3O4 to MnO [27–29]. In this context, the deposition of ultrasmall Ir NPs at the MnO2 surface has tremendously modified its reducibility property compared to the profile for pure MnO2 nanowires. More Figure 3. (A) XRD patterns and (B) TPR profiles of α-MnO2 nanowires before and after the deposition of ultrasmall Ir NPs. Due to metal-support interactions, the deposition of noble metals over MnO2 has been an efficient strategy for improving electrocatalytic performances [21,22]. Moreover, metal NPs may interact/cooperate with metal oxides to facilitate catalytic reactions, in which the reducibility of the inorganic matrix usually represents a key element over the detected catalytic activities [23,24]. To further provide in-depth information into these features, the ultrasmall Ir NPs decorated onto MnO2 nanowires by hydrogen temperature- programmed reduction was investigated, as shown in Figure 3B. Typically, the MnO2 reduction process to MnO can be divided into two reduction stages with Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 as intermediates [25,26]. Interestingly, the TPR profile for MnO2 nanowires indicates an intense and main reduction peak, centered at 337 ◦C, which can be assigned to the reduction of Mn4+ to Mn3+. Furthermore, a shoulder around 340 ◦C was observed and is related to the reduction of Mn3+ into Mn2+. These two almost overlapped reduction peaks suggest the coexistence of Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 intermediates, corresponding to the combined reduction of MnO2/Mn2O3 into Mn3O4 and Mn3O4 to MnO [27–29]. In this context, the deposition of ultrasmall Ir NPs at the MnO2 surface has tremendously modified its reducibility property compared to the profile for pure MnO2 nanowires. More specifically, the reduction peaks for MnO2-Ir nanowires were drastically shifted to lower temperatures, exhibiting a primary low intense and broad peak centered at 105 ◦C, attributed to the reduction of MnO2 to Mn2O3, and a main and intense reduction peak, centered at 165 ◦C, assigned to the reduction of Mn2O3 to MnO. This shift to lower temperatures indicates a facilitated reduction process, often related to strong metal-support interactions between metal NPs and MnO2 that may occur in the MnO2-Ir nanowires [14,29]. Moreover, the position of the hydrogen consumption peaks could also indicate the level of surface oxygen mobility in the metal oxide [30,31]. In this case, the increase in the surface oxygen mobility can also be associated with the shift of the reduction peaks to lower temperatures [30,31], indicating that higher reducibility of the MnO2-Ir nanowires relative to pure MnO2 nanowires may lead to higher mobility of surface oxygen vacancies species, which can consequently improve its catalytic activity. XPS analyses were performed to further study this behavior, the surface composition, oxidation state, and the charge transfer tendencies between ultrasmall Ir NPs and MnO2 Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 8 of 14 nanowires, as shown in Figure 4. Specifically, we were interested in probing the surface chemical changes that possibly could be observed before and after the deposition of Ir NPs at the nanowires’ surface. The survey spectrum shown in Figure 4A indicates that the samples’ surface is characterized by manganese oxide and iridium, as well as adventitious carbon and small amounts of chlorine, nitrogen, and potassium species related to the precursors. In Figure 4B,C, high-resolution spectra of pristine MnO2 nanowires are shown, in which the 4.8 eV splitting energy of Mn 3s and the Mn 2p peak envelope shape evidenced the formation of well-defined MnO2 [32]. Surface chemical analysis of MnO2 decorated with Ir NPs in Figure 4D indicates that Ir 4f photoemission peak can be described by three distinct doublet components with Ir 4f7/2 located at 62.5, 61.8, and 61 eV, related to IrClx, IrO2, and Ir species, respectively [33]. Interestingly, although our analysis suggests a large ratio of oxidized species and IrClx precursor-contamination as compared to metallic Ir, we expect, based on electron microscopy measurements shown in Figure S2, that the Ir NPs display metallic Ir rich-cores. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 14 specifically, the reduction peaks for MnO2-Ir nanowires were drastically shifted to lower temperatures, exhibiting a primary low intense and broad peak centered at 105 °C, attributed to the reduction of MnO2 to Mn2O3, and a main and intense reduction peak, centered at 165 °C, assigned to the reduction of Mn2O3 to MnO. This shift to lower temperatures indicates a facilitated reduction process, often related to strong metal- support interactions between metal NPs and MnO2 that may occur in the MnO2-Ir nanowires [14,29]. Moreover, the position of the hydrogen consumption peaks could also indicate the level of surface oxygen mobility in the metal oxide [30,31]. In this case, the increase in the surface oxygen mobility can also be associated with the shift of the reduction peaks to lower temperatures [30,31], indicating that higher reducibility of the MnO2-Ir nanowires relative to pure MnO2 nanowires may lead to higher mobility of surface oxygen vacancies species, which can consequently improve its catalytic activity. XPS analyses were performed to further study this behavior, the surface composition, oxidation state, and the charge transfer tendencies between ultrasmall Ir NPs and MnO2 nanowires, as shown in Figure 4. Specifically, we were interested in probing the surface chemical changes that possibly could be observed before and after the deposition of Ir NPs at the nanowires’ surface. The survey spectrum shown in Figure 4A indicates that the samples’ surface is characterized by manganese oxide and iridium, as well as adventitious carbon and small amounts of chlorine, nitrogen, and potassium species related to the precursors. In Figure 4B,C, high-resolution spectra of pristine MnO2 nano ires are sho n, in which the 4.8 eV splitti g energy of Mn 3s and the Mn 2p peak envelope shape evidenced the formation of well-defined MnO2 [32]. Surface chemical analysis of MnO2 deco ated with Ir NPs in Figure 4D indicates that Ir 4f photoemission peak can be described by three distinc doublet comp nents with Ir 4f7/2 located at 62.5, 61.8, and 61 eV, related to IrClx, IrO2, and Ir species, respectively [33]. Interestingly, although our nalysis suggests a large ratio of oxidized species a d IrClx precursor-c ntamination as compared to metallic Ir, we expect, bas d on el ctron microscopy measurements shown in Figure S2, that the Ir NP display metallic Ir rich-cores. Figure 4. (A) XPS survey spectra of MnO2 and MnO2-Ir (black and red curves, respectively). (B,E) Mn 3s for MnO2 (B) and MnO2-Ir (E), (C,F) Mn 2p for MnO2 (C) and MnO2-Ir (F), and Ir 4f for MnO2- Ir (D) core-level spectra. 800 600 400 200 0 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 96 93 90 87 84 81 78 668 664 660 656 652 648 644 640 636 668 664 660 656 652 648 644 640 63670 68 66 64 62 60 58 56 Survey VB Mn 3s Ir 4f Cl 2pN 1s K 2s C 1s O 1s Mn 2p Mn 2s Int en sit y ( a.u .) Binding Energy (eV) MnO2 MnO2−Ir MnO2 Mn 2p Mn 2pMn 3s Mn 3s Binding Energy (eV) 4.8 eV MnO2−Ir Binding Energy (eV) 5.3 eV Binding Energy (eV) Mn3+ 18 % Mn3+ 27 % MnO2 2p3/2 2p1/2 B C Binding Energy (eV) 2p3/2 2p1/2 MnO2−IrD IrO2 Int en sit y ( a.u .) Binding Energy (eV) MnO2−Ir Ir 4f4f7/2 4f5/2 Ir0 IrClx A E F Figure 4. ( ) XPS survey spectra of MnO2 and MnO2-Ir (black an red curv s, resp ctively). (B,E) Mn 3s for MnO2 (B) and MnO2-Ir (E), (C,F) Mn 2p for M O2 (C) and MnO2-Ir (F), and Ir 4f for MnO2-Ir (D) core-level spectra. More important, Figure 4E indicates that the Mn 3s’ larger separation energy splitting is related to MnO2 nanowires’ surface reduction from Mn4+ to Mn3+ [34]. Additional evidence of the MnO2 support chemical reduction is shown in Figure 4F with the Mn 2p high-resolution spectrum. In this, the Mn 2p3/2 region is analyzed based on multiplet fitting previously described by Biesinger & co-workers [32], in which the component located at 640.7 eV is related to low-coordinated Mn3+ species. The increase of the Mn3+ species from the pristine MnO2 surface compared to the Ir-decorated nanowires suggests oxygen vacancies formation may be promoted due to the Ir NPs synthesis. To estimate the XPS surface composition of MnO2-Ir nanowires, we employed the peaks of Mn 3s and Ir 4f7/2, as they are well separated by ~20 eV. For the 1.2 wt.% MnO2-Ir nanowires determined by ICP-OES, the Ir 4f7/2/Mn 3s ratio corresponded to 0.14 or 14%. The much higher Ir contents in XPS data relative to ICP-OES can be explained by the fact that XPS is a very sensitive surface technique, in which almost Ir atoms are expected to be exposed at the surface of the nanocatalyst and lead to a higher Ir/Mn ratio. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 9 of 14 The ESA of the MnO2-Ir nanowires was estimated by CO stripping. From the first voltammogram (Figure S3), the charge for CO oxidation was calculated; usually, the second run recovers the original voltammogram in the pure supporting electrolyte, indicating the complete oxidation of the CO monolayer. The catalyst area was estimated as 2.2 cm2. We are aware of the errors in this procedure, and, thus, we did not mean to compare this area value with other commercial electrocatalysts available here. Owing to their morphology comprising ultrasmall Ir NPs, large surface areas (one- dimensional nanowires displaying a high aspect ratio), the presence of oxygen vacancies, and strong metal-support interactions, we decided to investigate the catalytic activities of the MnO2-Ir nanowires towards the ORR; before the tests, CV curves were obtained to evaluate the electrochemical behavior of the electrocatalysts. Figure 5 shows the curves (from −0.5 to 0.2 V) for the glassy carbon modified with bare MnO2 nanowires and the prepared MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst in an N2-saturated aqueous solution KOH 0.1 mol L−1 (vs. Ag/AgCl (sat)). The modified electrode with the bare MnO2 nanowires presented evident redox waves. Specifically, the reduction peak at−0.35 V is attributed to Mn(IV)O2 to Mn(II), whereas the oxidation peak at 0.07 V denotes the oxidation of Mn(II) to MnO2 [35]. The CV curve for the modified electrode with MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst shows that the shape and electrochemical events are similar to the observed for the bare MnO2 nanowires, which can be explained by the low Ir loading (according to the ICP-OES analysis), hampering its identification in the voltammetry. However, a gain in current was detected, which can be related to the heterojunction between Ir NPs and MnO2 nanowires, in accordance with microscopy results. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 14 More important, Figure 4E indicates that the Mn 3s’ larger separation energy splitting is related to MnO2 nanowires’ surface reduction from Mn4+ to Mn3+ [34]. Additional evidence of the MnO2 support chemical reduction is shown in Figure 4F with the Mn 2p high-resolution spectrum. In this, the Mn 2p3/2 region is analyzed based on multiplet fitting previously described by Biesinger & co-workers [32], in which the component located at 640.7 eV is related to low-coordinated Mn3+ species. The increase of the Mn3+ species from the pristine MnO2 surface compared to the Ir-decorated nanowires suggests oxygen vacancies formation may be promoted due to the Ir NPs synthesis. To estimate the XPS surface composition of MnO2-Ir nanowires, we employed the peaks of Mn 3s and Ir 4f7/2, as they are well separated by ~20 eV. For the 1.2 wt.% MnO2-Ir nanowires determined by ICP-OES, the Ir 4f7/2/Mn 3s ratio corresponded to 0.14 or 14%. The much higher Ir contents in XPS data relative to ICP-OES can be explained by the fact that XPS is a very sensitive surface technique, in which almost Ir atoms are expected to be exposed at the surface of the nanocatalyst and lead to a higher Ir/Mn ratio. he S of the n 2-Ir nano ires as esti ate by stripping. Fro the first olta ogram (Figure S3), the charge for CO oxidation was calculated; usually, the second run recovers the original voltammogram in the pur supporting electrolyt , indicating the complete oxidation f the CO monolayer. The catalyst area was estimated s 2.2 cm2. We are aware of the errors in this procedure, and, thus, we did not mean to compare this area valu with other ommercial e ectrocatalysts available here. i t t i i i l i i l i t i teractions, we decided to investigate the cat lytic activ ties of the MnO2-Ir na owires towards the OR ; before the tests, CV r s t l t electr i i f t e electrocat l st . s t c r es (fr − . . l ifi it bare n 2 t repared MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst in an N2-saturated aqueous solution KOH 0.1 mol L−1 (vs. Ag/AgCl(sat)). The mo ifi d electrode with the bare M O2 nanowires pr sented evident redox waves. Specifically, the reduction peak at −0.35 V is attributed to Mn(IV)O2 to Mn(II), whereas the oxidation peak at 0.07 V denotes the oxidation of Mn(II) to MnO2 [35]. The CV curve for the modified electrode with MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst shows that the shape and electrochemical events are similar to the observed for the bare MnO2 nano ires, which can be explained by the low Ir loading (according to the ICP-OES analysis), hampering its identification in the voltammetry. However, a gain in current was detected, which can be related to the heterojunction between Ir NPs and MnO2 nanowires, in accordance with microscopy results. Figure 5. CV curves of the glassy carbon electrode modified with the bare MnO2 nanowires and the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst in an O2-saturated 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution at room temperature and a scan rate of 25 mV/s. To shed some light on this matter, we tested both materials’ catalytic activity towards ORR (Figure 6A,B). LSVs for the ORR for both materials were recorded at different electrode rotation rates (from 400 to 2500 rpm) in an O2-saturated 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution. As expected, the faster the rotation rates, the easier the flow of O2 to the electrode surface, followed by the increase in current densities due to the shortened diffusion layer. One can notice that both materials exhibit excellent adherence to the glassy carbon electrode surface. Furthermore, when MnO2 nanowires and MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst were compared with the commercial Pt/C electrocatalyst (Figure 6C), with a similar metal loading at a rotation rate of 1600 rpm, one can notice that the MnO2-Ir nanowires presented a lower onset potential and higher limiting current compared to the Pt/C catalyst, showing its incredible efficiency. We also compared the MnO2-Ir nanowires with the 20.0 wt.% Pt/C (Figure S4), which presented current and potential density close to the Pt counterpart. The results were presented in current, without considering the mass of precious metal. However, Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 10 of 14 such a commercial electrocatalyst offers 20 times more metal loading than the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst produced in the present work, showing the effectiveness of our material. The polarization curve of the MnO2-Ir material is analogous to the Pt/C counterpart, suggesting that the electrocatalyst can catalyze a 4e− ORR process per reagent molecule. The Koutecky–Levich (K–L) graphs for both materials (Figure 6D) at different potentials displayed a linear relationship, suggesting a first-order reaction in a potential range of −0.50 to 0.20 V. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 14 Figure 5. CV curves of the glassy carbon electrode modified with the bare MnO2 nanowires and the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst in an O2-saturated 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution at room temperature and a scan rate of 25 mV/s. To shed some light on this matter, we tested both materials’ catalytic activity towards ORR (Figure 6A,B). LSVs for the ORR for both materials were recorded at different electrode rotation rates (from 400 to 2500 rpm) in an O2-saturated 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution. As expected, the faster the rotation rates, the easier the flow of O2 to the electrode surface, followed by the increase in current densities due to the shortened diffusion layer. One can notice that both materials exhibit excellent adherence to the glassy carbon electrode surface. Furthermore, when MnO2 nanowires and MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst were compared with the commercial Pt/C electrocatalyst (Figure 6C), with a similar metal loading at a rotation rate of 1600 rpm, one can notice that the MnO2-Ir nanowires presented a lower onset potential and higher limiting current compared to the Pt/C catalyst, showing its incredible efficiency. We also compared the MnO2-Ir nanowires with the 20.0 wt.% Pt/C (Figure S4), which presented current and potential density close to the Pt counterpart. The results were presented in current, without considering the mass of precious etal. How ver, such a commercial electr catalyst offers 20 times more metal loading han the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst produced in the present work, showing the eff ctiveness of our material. The polarization curve of the MnO2-Ir material is a alogous to th Pt/C counterpart, suggesting that the electrocatalyst can atalyze a 4e− ORR process per reagent mol cule. The Koutecky–Levic (K–L) graphs for both materials (Figure 6D) at different pot ntials displayed a lin ar rel tionship, sugges ng a first-order reaction in a potential range of −0.50 to 0.20 V. Figure 6. LSVs for the MnO2 nanowires (A) and MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst (B) in 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution saturated with O2, v = 5 mV s−1. (C) Polarization curves for the ORR on MnO2, MnO2-Ir, and Figure 6. LSVs for the MnO2 nanowires (A) and MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst (B) in 0.1 mol L−1 K sol ti s t r te it 2, v = 5 mV s−1. (C) Polarization curves for the ORR on MnO2, MnO2-Ir, and 1.2 wt.% Pt/C materials, in 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution, f = 1600 rpm, v = 5 mV s−1, room temperature. (D) Koutecky - Levich graphs for the oxygen reduction reaction on MnO2-Ir and MnO2, in 0.1 mol L−1 KOH solution, at different electrode rotation speeds, v = 5 mV s−1, room temperature. The K-L plot slopes were used to estimate the number of electrons (n) necessary for the reaction; the MnO2-Ir nanowires presented 3.74 e−, an approximate 4e− process, whereas the MnO2 nanowires presented 3.17 e− during the ORR. The MnO2-Ir nanowires presented a similar number of electrons to the commercial 20.0 wt.% Pt/C electrocatalyst (3.89 e−). The catalyst based on Pt with similar metal loading to our electrocatalyst presented 2.77 e−, which is quite interesting. It does mean that our electrocatalyst can generate H2O as the product even at low Ir loading, which is not the case for the commercial catalyst based on Pt with a similar loading. Thus, our data show that the nanoengineering of electrocatalysts enables us to get materials with electrocatalytic results very similar to Pt. Additionally, Tafel plots were used to offer some understanding of the reaction mech- anism of the prepared material. Figure S5 displays the Tafel plot and suggests that the rate-determining step corresponds to the first electron transfer once the slopes for the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst was 119.0 mV dec−1, and 120 mV dec−1 was obtained for the Pt/C, Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 11 of 14 very similar to the literature [36]. The following proposed mechanism is based on our understanding: [Ir.MnO2]− +O2 ↔ [O2−[Ir.MnO2]]− [O2 − [Ir.MnO2]]− + e− → [O−2 − [Ir.MnO2]]2− (determining reaction step) [O−2 − [Ir.MnO2]]2− + e− + H2O→ [HO−2 − [Ir.MnO2]]2− +OH− [HO−2 − [Ir.MnO2]]2− + 2e− + H2O→ [Ir.MnO2]− + 3OH− Fuel cells in which methanol is used as the fuel are promising due to their high energy density and storage (known as Direct Methanol Fuel Cells—DMFCs). In addition, methanol utilization prompts quick refueling and can be considered portable power systems appli- cations [37,38]. However, Pt-based electrocatalysts are prone to the so-called methanol crossover effect, which is the transport of methanol from the anode to the cathode, lowering the limiting current density of the fuel cell [39]. In this scenario, it was decided to evaluate our prepared electrocatalyst’s resistance to methanol poisoning. Figure 7 depicts the results obtained in the electrocatalytic process towards ORR in the presence of methanol, obtained at 1600 rpm, v = 5 mV s−1, O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution). As a comparison, the Pt/C electrocatalyst was used. One can notice that the Pt/C material presented a significant effect due to the methanol available in the medium at 0.05 M, being not selective and allowing both methanol oxidation and oxygen reduction reactions to occur simultaneously (Figure 7A). Conversely, the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst was very resistant to methanol oxi- dation, being very selective (Figure 7B). The onset potentials for the electrocatalysts were −0.005 and −0.571 V for the Pt/C and MnO2-Ir electrocatalysts, respectively, i.e., even counting on 20 times less metal loading, the Ir-based electrocatalyst was very efficient. The Pt electrocatalyst configuration can explain it; literature deals with the need for three adjacent Pt sites for the methanol oxidation reaction to occur [40,41]. Based on our findings, the same does not happen with Ir active sites. The halfwave potential (E1/2) obtained between diffusion limiting regions and the kinetic currents of the polarization curves for the electrocatalysts is similar: −0.19 and −0.21 V for the Pt/C and Ir-MnO2 electrocatalysts, respectively. Such data suggests similar reaction kinetics for both [42]. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 14 Figure 7. (A) Comparison between the ORR polarization curves of MnO2-Ir and Pt/C electrocatalysts and (B) ORR polarization curves recorded for the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst without methanol and at 0.05 M of the alcohol. To further evaluate the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst’s efficiency and superior performance, we prepared an Ir/C material using the same procedure. Figure S6 shows that such material presents a higher onset potential and a lower limiting current than the MnO2-Ir and Pt/C electrocatalysts, offering lower performance. Such a result corroborates the strong interactions between the support and Ir NPs, suggested by the TPR results. 4. Conclusions In conclusion, the present investigation demonstrated that MnO2 nanowires decorated with Ir NPs could be employed as heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction, being a promising nanocatalyst compared to commercial platinum. Through a simple synthesis, it was possible to obtain nanowires with defined shape and size that could serve as templates for Ir NPs nucleation and growth without any surface modification, which in turn oxidize to IrO2 while MnO2 is reduced. Moreover, the resistance to the methanol crossover effect is significant and opens up the possibility of future studies aiming to improve such an effect for more concentrated methanol solutions. Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Table S1: Chemical and textural properties; Figure S1: HRTEM and histogram of NPs distribution; Figure S2: HRTEM images; Figure S3. CO-stripping on MnO2-Ir; Figure S4: Polarization curves for the ORR on title; Figure S5: ORR Tafel plot. Figure S6: ORR polarization curves. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.L.S.d.L., J.B., M.A.S.G. and A.G.M.d.S.; methodology, S.L.S.d.L., F.S.P., R.B.d.L., M.A.S.G. and A.G.M.d.S.; validation, S.L.S.d.L., J.B, M.A.S.G. and A.G.M.d.S.; formal analysis, I.C.d.F., H.V.F., J.S., B.J.C.; investigation, S.L.S.d.L., I.C.d.F., H.V.F., J.S., J.B. and R.B.d.L.; resources, B.J.C., F.S., H.A.V., H.V.F.; data curation, M.A.S.G., B.J.C., A.G.M.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.S.d.L., F.S., M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S.; writing—review and editing, F.S., A.A.T., M.A.S.G., H.V.F., H.A.V., B.J.C., A.G.M.d.S.; visualization, M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S.; supervision, M.A.S.G., project administration, M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S.; funding acquisition, F.S., A.A.T., H.A.V., B.J.C., M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro—(FAPERJ, grant number #E-26/201.315/2021). Access to advanced microscopy facilities at University of Manchester was provided via the Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials, funded through EPSRC grants EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/P025021/1 and EP/P025498/1). S.L.S.de L. thanks CNPq for her graduate fellowship. The authors also acknowledge the financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Figure 7. (A) Comparison between the ORR polarization curves of MnO2-Ir and Pt/C electrocatalysts and (B) ORR polarization curves recorded for the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst without methanol and at 0.05 M of the alcohol. To further evaluate the MnO2-Ir electrocatalyst’s efficiency and superior performance, we prepared an Ir/C material using the same procedure. Figure S6 shows that such material presents a higher onset potential and a lower limiting current than the MnO2-Ir Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 12 of 14 and Pt/C electrocatalysts, offering lower performance. Such a result corroborates the strong interactions between the support and Ir NPs, suggested by the TPR results. 4. Conclusions In conclusion, the present investigation demonstrated that MnO2 nanowires decorated with Ir NPs could be employed as heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction, being a promising nanocatalyst compared to commercial platinum. Through a simple synthesis, it was possible to obtain nanowires with defined shape and size that could serve as templates for Ir NPs nucleation and growth without any surface modification, which in turn oxidize to IrO2 while MnO2 is reduced. Moreover, the resistance to the methanol crossover effect is significant and opens up the possibility of future studies aiming to improve such an effect for more concentrated methanol solutions. Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https: //www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12173039/s1, Table S1: Chemical and textural properties; Figure S1: HRTEM and histogram of NPs distribution; Figure S2: HRTEM images; Figure S3. CO- stripping on MnO2-Ir; Figure S4: Polarization curves for the ORR on title; Figure S5: ORR Tafel plot. Figure S6: ORR polarization curves. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, S.L.S.d.L., J.B., M.A.S.G. and A.G.M.d.S.; methodol- ogy, S.L.S.d.L., F.S.P., R.B.d.L., M.A.S.G. and A.G.M.d.S.; validation, S.L.S.d.L., J.B, M.A.S.G. and A.G.M.d.S.; formal analysis, I.C.d.F., H.V.F., J.S., B.J.C.; investigation, S.L.S.d.L., I.C.d.F., H.V.F., J.S., J.B. and R.B.d.L.; resources, B.J.C., F.S., H.A.V., H.V.F.; data curation, M.A.S.G., B.J.C., A.G.M.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.S.d.L., F.S., M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S.; writing—review and edit- ing, F.S., A.A.T., M.A.S.G., H.V.F., H.A.V., B.J.C., A.G.M.d.S.; visualization, M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S.; supervision, M.A.S.G., project administration, M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S.; funding acquisition, F.S., A.A.T., H.A.V., B.J.C., M.A.S.G., A.G.M.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro—(FAPERJ, grant number #E-26/201.315/2021). Access to advanced microscopy facilities at University of Manchester was provided via the Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials, funded through EPSRC grants EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/P025021/1 and EP/P025498/1). S.L.S.de L. thanks CNPq for her graduate fellowship. The authors also acknowledge the financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (FAPEMA, grant INFRA-02264/21) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Finance Code 001). Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable. Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Data are contained within the article. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. References 1. Siow, J.H.; Bilad, M.R.; Caesarendra, W.; Leam, J.J.; Bustam, M.A.; Sambudi, N.S.; Wibisono, Y.; Mahlia, T.M. Progress in Development of Nanostructured Manganese Oxide as Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction and Evolution Reaction. Energies 2021, 14, 6385. [CrossRef] 2. Fiorio, J.L.; Gothe, M.L.; Kohlrausch, E.C.; Zardo, M.L.; Tanaka, A.A.; de Lima, R.B.; da Silva, A.G.M.; Garcia, M.A.S.; Vidinha, P.; Machado, G. Nanoengineering of Catalysts for Enhanced Hydrogen Production. Hydrogen 2022, 3, 218–254. [CrossRef] 3. Dessie, Y.; Tadesse, S.; Eswaramoorthy, R.; Abebe, B. Recent Developments in Manganese Oxide Based Nanomaterials with Oxygen Reduction Reaction Functionalities for Energy Conversion and Storage Applications: A Review. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 2019, 4, 353–369. [CrossRef] 4. Li, G.; Jiang, M.; Liao, Q.; Ding, R.; Gao, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, D.; Chen, S.; He, H. Directly Anchoring Ag Single Atoms on α-MnO2 Nanorods as Efficient Oxygen Reduction Catalysts for Mg-Air Fuel Cell. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 858, 157672. [CrossRef] 5. da Silva, A.G.M.; Rodrigues, T.S.; Wang, J.; Camargo, P.H.C. Plasmonic Catalysis with Designer Nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 2055–2074. [CrossRef] Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 13 of 14 6. Dong, Y.; Xue, Y.; Gu, W.; Yang, Z.; Xu, G. MnO2 Nanowires/CNTs Composites as Efficient Non-Precious Metal Catalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 837, 55–59. [CrossRef] 7. Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Wilkinson, D.P.; Zhang, J. Recent Progresses in Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysts for Electrochemical Energy Applications. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2019, 2, 518–538. [CrossRef] 8. Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Qu, Y.; Yuan, T.; Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y. Review of Metal Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction: From Nanoscale Engineering to Atomic Design. Chem 2019, 5, 1486–1511. [CrossRef] 9. Stacy, J.; Regmi, Y.N.; Leonard, B.; Fan, M. The Recent Progress and Future of Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalysis: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 401–414. [CrossRef] 10. Xia, Y.; Yang, X. Toward Cost-Effective and Sustainable Use of Precious Metals in Heterogeneous Catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 450–454. [CrossRef] 11. Goswami, C.; Hazarika, K.K.; Bharali, P. Transition Metal Oxide Nanocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2018, 1, 117–128. [CrossRef] 12. Cheng, F.; Su, Y.; Liang, J.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. MnO2-Based Nanostructures as Catalysts for Electrochemical Oxygen Reduction in Alkaline Media. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 898–905. [CrossRef] 13. Suen, N.T.; Hung, S.F.; Quan, Q.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y.J.; Chen, H.M. Electrocatalysis for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction: Recent Development and Future Perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 337–365. [CrossRef] 14. da Silva, A.G.M.; Kisukuri, C.M.; Rodrigues, T.S.; Candido, E.G.; de Freitas, I.C.; da Silva, A.H.M.; Assaf, J.M.; Oliveira, D.C.; Andrade, L.H.; Camargo, P.H.C. MnO2 Nanowires Decorated with Au Ultrasmall Nanoparticles for the Green Oxidation of Silanes and Hydrogen Production under Ultralow Loadings. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 184, 35–43. [CrossRef] 15. Wang, Z.; Gao, W.; Xu, Q.; Ren, X.; Xu, S.; Zhu, S.; Niu, X.; Li, X.; Zhao, R.; Han, Y.; et al. Influence of the MnO2 Phase on Oxygen Evolution Reaction Performance for Low-Loading Iridium Electrocatalysts. ChemElectroChem 2021, 8, 418–424. [CrossRef] 16. Sun, W.; Zhou, Z.; Zaman, W.Q.; Cao, L.M.; Yang, J. Rational Manipulation of IrO2 Lattice Strain on α-MnO2 Nanorods as a Highly Efficient Water-Splitting Catalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 41855–41862. [CrossRef] 17. Uribe-Godínez, J.; Altamirano-Gutiérrez, A. Systematic Study of Iridium-Based Catalysts Derived from Ir4(CO)12, Capable to Perform the ORR and HOR. Catal. Today 2021, 374, 124–134. [CrossRef] 18. Garcia, M.A.S.; Oliveira, K.C.B.; Costa, J.C.S.; Corio, P.; Gusevskaya, E.V.; Dos Santos, E.N.; Rossi, L.M. Rhodium Nanoparticles as Precursors for the Preparation of an Efficient and Recyclable Hydroformylation Catalyst. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 1566–1572. [CrossRef] 19. Garcia, M.A.S.; Heyder, R.S.; Oliveira, K.C.B.; Costa, J.C.S.; Corio, P.; Gusevskaya, E.V.; Santos, N.; Bazito, R.C.; Rossi, L.M. Support Functionalization with a Phosphine-Containing Hyperbranched Polymer: A Strategy to Enhance Phosphine Grafting and Metal Loading in a Hydroformylation Catalyst. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 1951–1960. [CrossRef] 20. Wang, X.; Li, Y. Selected-Control Hydrothermal Synthesis of α- and β-MnO2 Single Crystal Nanowires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2880–2881. [CrossRef] 21. Salvador, G.M.S.; Silva, A.L.; Silva, L.P.C.; Passos, F.B.; Carvalho, N.M.F. Enhanced Activity of Pd/α-MnO2 for Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 26976–26988. [CrossRef] 22. Dai, L.; Sun, Q.; Chen, L.; Guo, H.; Nie, X.; Cheng, J.; Guo, J.; Li, J.; Lou, J.; Ci, L. Ag Doped Urchin-like α-MnO2 toward Efficient and Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Li-O2 Batteries. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 2356–2364. [CrossRef] 23. Borges, L.R.; da Silva, A.G.M.; Braga, A.H.; Rossi, L.M.; Suller Garcia, M.A.; Vidinha, P. Towards the Effect of Pt0/Ptδ+ and Ce3+ Species at the Surface of CeO2 Crystals: Understanding the Nature of the Interactions under CO Oxidation Conditions. ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 1340–1354. [CrossRef] 24. Rosado, T.F.; Teixeira, M.P.; Moraes, L.C.; Silva, L.A.d.; Pontes-Silva, A.V.; Taylor, J.G.; de Freitas, I.C.; de Oliveira, D.C.; Gardener, J.; Solórzano, G.; et al. Synergistic Effect between CeO2 Nanowires and Gold NPs over the Activity and Selectivity in the Oxidation of Thioanisole. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2021, 613, 118010. [CrossRef] 25. Jia, J.; Zhang, P.; Chen, L. Catalytic Decomposition of Gaseous Ozone over Manganese Dioxides with Different Crystal Structures. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 189, 210–218. [CrossRef] 26. Lu, S.; Zhu, Q.; Dong, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, K.; Huang, F.; Peng, B.; Chen, Y. Influence of MnO2 Morphology on the Catalytic Performance of Ag/MnO2 for the HCHO Oxidation. Catal. Surv. Asia 2019, 23, 210–218. [CrossRef] 27. Zhai, X.; Jing, F.; Li, L.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ma, J.; Chu, W. Toluene Catalytic Oxidation over the Layered MOx−δ-MnO2 (M = Pt, Ir, Ag) Composites Originated from the Facile Self-Driving Combustion Method. Fuel 2021, 283, 118888. [CrossRef] 28. Li, L.; Chu, W.; Liu, Y. Insights into Key Parameters of MnO2 Catalyst toward High Catalytic Combustion Performance. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 6361–6373. [CrossRef] 29. Ferraz, C.P.; Da Silva, A.G.M.; Rodrigues, T.S.; Camargo, P.H.C.; Paul, S.; Wojcieszak, R. Furfural Oxidation on Gold Supported on MnO2: Influence of the Support Structure on the Catalytic Performances. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1246. [CrossRef] 30. Gong, P.; Xie, J.; Fang, D.; Han, D.; He, F.; Li, F.; Qi, K. Effects of Surface Physicochemical Properties on NH3-SCR Activity of MnO2 Catalysts with Different Crystal Structures. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 1925–1934. [CrossRef] 31. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; He, H. Catalytic Oxidation of Formaldehyde over Manganese Oxides with Different Crystal Structures. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2305–2313. [CrossRef] Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3039 14 of 14 32. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving Surface Chemical States in XPS Analysis of First Row Transition Metals, Oxides and Hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [CrossRef] 33. Freakley, S.J.; Ruiz-Esquius, J.; Morgan, D.J. The X-Ray Photoelectron Spectra of Ir, IrO2 and IrCl3 Revisited. Surf. Interface Anal. 2017, 49, 794–799. [CrossRef] 34. Oku, M.; Hirokawa, K.; Ikeda, S. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Manganese-Oxygen Systems. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1975, 7, 465–473. [CrossRef] 35. Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Qu, R.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Q. The Laccase-like Reactivity of Manganese Oxide Nanomaterials for Pollutant Conversion: Rate Analysis and Cyclic Voltammetry. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 36. Franca, M.C.; Ferreira, R.M.; dos Santos Pereira, F.; e Silva, F.A.; Silva, A.C.A.; Cunha, L.C.S.; de Jesus Gomes Varela Júnior, J.; Neto, P.d.L.; Takana, A.A.; Rodrigues, T.S.; et al. Galvanic Replacement Managing Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: AgPt Nanotubes as a Strategy for Methanol Crossover Effect Tolerance. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 8225–8240. [CrossRef] 37. Joghee, P.; Malik, J.N.; Pylypenko, S.; O’Hayre, R. A Review on Direct Methanol Fuel Cells—In the Perspective of Energy and Sustainability. MRS Energy Sustain. 2015, 2, 3. [CrossRef] 38. Mehmood, A.; Scibioh, M.A.; Prabhuram, J.; An, M.G.; Ha, H.Y. A Review on Durability Issues and Restoration Techniques in Long-Term Operations of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. J. Power Source 2015, 297, 224–241. [CrossRef] 39. Remona, A.M.; Phani, K.L.N. Methanol-Tolerant Oxygen Reduction Reaction at Pt–Pd C Alloy Nanocatalysts. J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2011, 8, 0110011–0110016. [CrossRef] 40. Xu, H.; Ding, L.X.; Liang, C.L.; Tong, Y.X.; Li, G.R. High-Performance Polypyrrole Functionalized PtPd Electrocatalysts Based on PtPd/PPy/PtPd Three-Layered Nanotube Arrays for the Electrooxidation of Small Organic Molecules. NPG Asia Mater. 2013, 5, e69. [CrossRef] 41. Scheijen, F.J.E.; Beltramo, G.L.; Hoeppener, S.; Housmans, T.H.M.; Koper, M.T.M. The Electrooxidation of Small Organic Molecules on Platinum Nanoparticles Supported on Gold: Influence of Platinum Deposition Procedure. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2008, 12, 483–495. [CrossRef] 42. Rodrigues, M.R.M.; Ferreira, R.M.; Pereira, F.S.; Silva, F.A.; Silva, A.C.A.; Vitorino, H.A.; Junior, J.J.G.V.; Tanaka, A.A.; Garcia, M.A.S.; Rodrigues, T.S. Application of AgPt Nanoshells in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells: Experimental and Theoretical Insights of Design Electrocatalysts over Methanol Crossover Effect. ChemCatChem 2022. [CrossRef]