Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMejia, Christian R.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorAveiro-Róbalo, Telmo Raúles_ES
dc.contributor.authorGarlisi-Torales, Luciana D.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCarranza Esteban, Renzo Felipees_ES
dc.contributor.authorMamani-Benito, Oscares_ES
dc.contributor.authorVilela-Estrada, Martín A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSerna-Alarcón, Víctor
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo-Aguilar, Damary S.
dc.contributor.authorRojas-Roa, Javiera L.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T19:00:16Z
dc.date.available2022-10-17T19:00:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/6862
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: COVID-19 has generated great repercussions for the population globally; millions of deaths have been reported worldwide. The idea of death is especially exacerbated when there are close to death experiences that remind us how close we are to fatality. This is why it is important to measure fatalistic ideas of those who have not yet been infected. Objective: To revalidate a scale that measures fatalistic perception prior to COVID-19 infection in a population of 13 Latin American countries. Methodology: We conducted an instrumental study. We used a previously validated scale in Peru, with seven items divided into two factors and with five possible Likert-type responses (from strongly disagree to strongly agree). It was administered to a large population in 13 Spanish-speaking countries in Latin America; for each of the seven questions, 886 people were surveyed. With these results, descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. Results: The mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis of the seven initial questions were adequate in most cases. In the confirmatory factor analysis, the lack of fit was improved with the indexes' modification technique, which let us delete items 1 and 6. Thus, we could obtain satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices (CFI = 0.972, TLI = 0.931, GFI = 0.990, AGFI = 0.961, RMSEA = 0.080, and RMR = 0.047). Therefore, the final two-factor structure had a fairly adequate Cronbach's α (0.72, with a 95% confidence interval = 0.70–0.73). Conclusions: The scale that measures fatalism of Latin American countries in the face of the pandemic generated by COVID-19 was revalidated and shortened.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoIngléses_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers in Psychiatryes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectcoronavirus infections, pandemics, fatalistic perception, validation study, Latin Americaes_ES
dc.titlePerceived Fatality Prior to COVID-19 Infection in 13 Latin American Countries (FAT-LAT-COVID-19): Revalidation of a Shortened Scalees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.724061
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.publisher.countryCHes_ES
dc.subject.ocdehttp://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.00es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess