Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMoya-Salazar, Jeeles_ES
dc.contributor.authorJaime-Quispe, Alexises_ES
dc.contributor.authorMilachay, Yeferson S.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorCañari, Betsyes_ES
dc.contributor.authorLozano-Zanely, Glennes_ES
dc.contributor.authorChicoma-Flores, Karinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorMoya-Salazar, Marcia M.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorContreras-Pulache, Hanses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T16:05:55Z
dc.date.available2023-03-06T16:05:55Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-13
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13053/7951
dc.description.abstract“Introduction: As face-to-face medical education was restricted during the pandemic; digital tools have been deployed to continue education showing a good educational impact in most countries. However, the perception of medical students in Peru on eLearning has not yet been investigated. This study assessed the perception of 440 medical students from two national universities in Peru on the characteristics and limitations of eLearning during 2021. Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using the self-administered survey Encuesta Virtual en Tiempos de COVID-19 (EVI-CV19) on students between the second and sixth medical year of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM) and the Universidad Nacional San Luis Gonzaga (UNSLG, n=325). Results: The majority of students were under 30 years of age (93.9% vs. 97.2%, p=0.084), and female (67% vs. 64%, p=0.107). Of the total, 63.9% and 81.5% UNMSM and UNSLG students considered the virtual platform effective in favouring feedback with recorded lectures (85.2% vs. 85.5%) and the organization of documents (61.7% vs. 80.9%), respectively (p>0.05). Seventy per cent and 46.8% of UNMSM and UNSLG students perceived that teachers were nottrained (p=0.063), and 26.1% and17.2% of students perceived thatthe virtual modality affected their academic performance a lot, respectively (p=0.003). About 38% of students from both universities perceived the virtual platforms as very secure. We found differences between UNMSM and UNSLG students on whether the virtual exams were fair (28.7% vs. 52.3%, p<0.001). Conclusions: This study reported a favorable perception of medical eLearning with clear differences in the limitations of the virtual environment.“es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherModestum LTDes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectmedical education, COVID-19, eLearning, distance education, Perues_ES
dc.title“What is the perception of medical students about eLearning during the COVID-19 pandemic? A multicenter study in Peru“es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.identifier.doi"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/12289 "es_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.publisher.countryGBes_ES
dc.subject.ocdehttp://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.00es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(es)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess