Examinando por Autor "Cangalaya Garay, Felisia Rosario"

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1

Acceso abierto
Total family risk in families from the Unión Alto Prialé Santa Clara Housing Association, 2019
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2019-07-31) Cangalaya Garay, Felisia Rosario; Cárdenas de Fernández, María Hilda
Objective: Determine the total family risk in families of the Unión Alto de Prialé Santa Clara Housing Association, 2019. Materials and methods: Quantitative, descriptive approach, in terms of the cross-sectional, non-experimental methodological design, with a total population of 174 families, meeting the criteria (inclusion - exclusion), the technique applied was the survey and to measure the total family risk, a data collection instrument called the Total Family Risk questionnaire or RFT was applied. 5:33 by Pilar Amaya, this comprises 33 items grouped into 5 dimensions. Results: Regarding the total risk level, 58.05% obtained a high risk level; 39.66% obtained a total threatened risk level and 2.30% obtained a low level. In the psychoaffective conditions dimension, 50.00% obtained a low risk level; 32.18% obtained a threatened risk level and 17.82% obtained a high level. In the health services and practices dimension, 71.26% obtained a threatened risk level; 22.99% obtained a low risk level and 5.75% obtained a high risk level. In the housing and neighborhood conditions dimension, 47.13% obtained a high risk level; 28.74% obtained a threatened risk level and 24.14% obtained a low risk level. In the socioeconomic situation dimension, 63.79% obtained a threatened risk level; 20.11% obtained a high risk level and 16.09% obtained a low risk level. In the minor management dimension, 44.25% obtained a low risk level; 35.63% obtained a threatened risk level and 20.11% obtained a high risk level. Conclusions: In total family risk, the majority belong to high risk families. With respect to the psychoaffective conditions dimension, they belong to low-risk families. With respect to the dimension of health services and practices, they belong to threatened families. With respect to the housing and neighborhood conditions dimension, they belong to high-risk families. With respect to the socioeconomic situation dimension, they belong to threatened families.