Examinando por Autor "Cruz Mendoza, Rocío Janet"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Acceso abierto Effectiveness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation to improve oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory failure presenting to the emergency department(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-09-15) Cruz Mendoza, Rocío Janet; Miranda Vidal, Santos Yuly; Avila Vargas Machuca, Jeannette GiselleObjective: To evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Methodology: The selected articles were subjected to a critical reading, using the GRADE assessment to identify their level of evidence. Results: The result of the study indicates that 80% of the articles reviewed affirm that non-invasive mechanical ventilation is effective, while 20% state that it is not, but in this case, they suggest further studies. Using databases such as Pubmed, Medline, Elsevier, and Scielo, 10 articles from different regions of the world were studied, including three meta-analyses, two cross-sectional descriptive studies, and one quasi-experimental study, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, longitudinal experimental, and analytical descriptive, all supporting the effectiveness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation. It is worth mentioning that no studies were found on this topic in Peru, or they have not been published. Conclusions: The studies determine that non-invasive mechanical ventilation has become a safe and effective treatment in a wide range of acute and chronic respiratory failure situations.Ítem Acceso abierto Effectiveness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation to improve oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory failure presenting to the emergency department(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-09-15) Cruz Mendoza, Rocío Janet; Miranda Vidal, Santos Yuly; Avila Vargas Machuca, Jeannette GiselleObjective: To evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Methodology: The selected articles were subjected to a critical reading, using the GRADE assessment to identify their level of evidence. Results: The result of the study indicates that 80% of the articles reviewed affirm that non-invasive mechanical ventilation is effective, while 20% state that it is not, but in this case, they suggest further studies. Using databases such as Pubmed, Medline, Elsevier, and Scielo, 10 articles from different regions of the world were studied, including three meta-analyses, two cross-sectional descriptive studies, and one quasi-experimental study, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, longitudinal experimental, and analytical descriptive, all supporting the effectiveness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation. It is worth mentioning that no studies were found on this topic in Peru, or they have not been published. Conclusions: The studies determine that non-invasive mechanical ventilation has become a safe and effective treatment in a wide range of acute and chronic respiratory failure situations.
