Examinando por Autor "Cueva Velaisosa, María Susana"

Seleccione resultados tecleando las primeras letras
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Effectiveness of Continuous Infusion versus Bolus Administration of the diuretic Furosemide in the management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Cabrera Alarcón, Gloria Adela; Cueva Velaisosa, María Susana; Matta Solis, Hernán Hugo
    Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus administration of furosemide in the management of acute decompensated heart failure. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic, observational, and retrospective review of quantitative studies, critically selected, using the Grade evaluation system to determine the level of evidence. The articles were found in the following databases: PubMed, Open Access, Wiley Online Library, Science Direct, BioMed Central, and BMJ. Ten articles were systematically reviewed, of which 30% (n=3/10) were meta-analyses, and 70% (n=7/10) were randomized clinical trials. These studies were from the United States (40%), China (10%), Malaysia (10%), Italy (10%), Spain (10%), India (10%), and Portugal (10%). Results: 60% (n=6/10) indicate that continuous infusion is more effective than bolus administration of furosemide in managing acute decompensated heart failure. 40% (n=4/10) report no significant differences in safety or efficacy between continuous administration of furosemide and bolus injection in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Conclusion: Continuous infusion is more effective than bolus administration of furosemide in managing acute decompensated heart failure.
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Effectiveness of Continuous Infusion versus Bolus Administration of the diuretic Furosemide in the management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Cabrera Alarcón, Gloria Adela; Cueva Velaisosa, María Susana; Matta Solis, Hernán Hugo
    Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus administration of furosemide in the management of acute decompensated heart failure. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic, observational, and retrospective review of quantitative studies, critically selected, using the Grade evaluation system to determine the level of evidence. The articles were found in the following databases: PubMed, Open Access, Wiley Online Library, Science Direct, BioMed Central, and BMJ. Ten articles were systematically reviewed, of which 30% (n=3/10) were meta-analyses, and 70% (n=7/10) were randomized clinical trials. These studies were from the United States (40%), China (10%), Malaysia (10%), Italy (10%), Spain (10%), India (10%), and Portugal (10%). Results: 60% (n=6/10) indicate that continuous infusion is more effective than bolus administration of furosemide in managing acute decompensated heart failure. 40% (n=4/10) report no significant differences in safety or efficacy between continuous administration of furosemide and bolus injection in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Conclusion: Continuous infusion is more effective than bolus administration of furosemide in managing acute decompensated heart failure.