Examinando por Autor "Quilca Calatayud, Gissella Mercedes"

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3

Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of an educational intervention on healthy lunchbox knowledge and content for preschoolers' mothers
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2015) Quilca Calatayud, Gissella Mercedes; Ramírez Aliaga, Roxana; Cruz Pardo, Luz María
General Objective: To determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention on knowledge of healthy lunchboxes and their contents among mothers of preschool children at the Patricia Teresa Rodríguez 3019 Educational Institution in Rímac, 2015. Materials and Methods: This study adopted a quantitative approach, with a pre-experimental and longitudinal design. The sample consisted of 25 mothers from the Patricia Teresa Rodríguez 3019 School – UGEL 02 Rímac. The instrument used was a questionnaire, and the data were processed using the Excel program, with descriptive statistics applied. Results: Before the educational intervention (EI), 52% (13) of the mothers had a low level of knowledge about healthy lunchboxes; after the EI, 100% (25) reached a high level. Before the EI, 68% (17) had a low level of knowledge about types of foods; after the EI, 96% (24) reached a high level. Before the EI, 56% (14) had a low level of knowledge about healthy lunchbox preparation methods, and 44% (11) had a medium level; after the EI, 100% (25) reached a high level. Before the EI, 64% (16) had a low level of knowledge about the contents of healthy lunchboxes; after the educational intervention, 100% (25) of the mothers achieved a high level. Conclusion: The educational intervention was effective in enhancing the mothers' knowledge about healthy lunchboxes, as improvements were observed in their understanding after participating, with all mothers achieving a high level of knowledge.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-09-15) Quilca Calatayud, Gissella Mercedes; Ramirez Aliaga, Roxana Yanis; Remuzgo Artezano, Anika
Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 studies were selected. The systematic review of the 10 scientific articles on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure was conducted using the following databases: Lilacs, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Plus. It included 1 meta-analysis, 1 systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 systematic review, 2 experimental studies, 4 randomized clinical trials, and 1 cross-sectional study. Results: Of the 10 articles reviewed, 90% (n=9/10) agree that there is sufficient scientific evidence that high-flow hemodialysis has greater benefits than low-flow hemodialysis in preventing or delaying the onset of long-term complications in the evolutionary process of patients undergoing dialysis. 10% (n=1/10) concludes that there are no significant differences between the use of high-flow hemodialysis and low-flow hemodialysis. Conclusions: The systematically reviewed articles provide evidence that high-flow hemodialysis is more effective than low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-09-15) Quilca Calatayud, Gissella Mercedes; Ramirez Aliaga, Roxana Yanis; Remuzgo Artezano, Anika
Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 studies were selected. The systematic review of the 10 scientific articles on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure was conducted using the following databases: Lilacs, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Plus. It included 1 meta-analysis, 1 systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 systematic review, 2 experimental studies, 4 randomized clinical trials, and 1 cross-sectional study. Results: Of the 10 articles reviewed, 90% (n=9/10) agree that there is sufficient scientific evidence that high-flow hemodialysis has greater benefits than low-flow hemodialysis in preventing or delaying the onset of long-term complications in the evolutionary process of patients undergoing dialysis. 10% (n=1/10) concludes that there are no significant differences between the use of high-flow hemodialysis and low-flow hemodialysis. Conclusions: The systematically reviewed articles provide evidence that high-flow hemodialysis is more effective than low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure.