Examinando por Autor "Quispe Napa, Susan Johanna"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Acceso abierto Perception of humanized nursing care and level of anxiety in hemodialysis patients of a public hospital, Lima 2023(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2024-01-28) Quispe Napa, Susan Johanna; Fernández Rengifo, Werther FernandoIntroduction: Humanized nursing care must be comprehensive, holistic; this aspect is a crucial component in terms of user perception and anxiety, which would consequently impact the development of the disease and influence their health. Objective: “Determine the relationship between the perception of humanized nursing care and the level of anxiety in hemodialysis users in a public hospital in Lima, 2023.” Methods: hypothetical deductive, quantitative, applied, non-experimental, correlational, transversal. 75 Hemodialysis patients will be surveyed to know the perception of humanized care using the PCHE 3rd version questionnaire, tested validity and Crombach's alpha reliability = 0.96; Anxiety level will be measured with a validated Anxiety Test and reliability α= 0.85. The results will be given through SPSS 26 statistical programs. They will be evidenced through figures and tables.Ítem Acceso abierto Sociodemographic factors and perception of humanized nursing care in the medicine department at Arzobispo Loayza National Hospital, Lima – 2018(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2019-03-12) Torres Suarez, Ana Ivet; Quispe Napa, Susan Johanna; Orellana Arauco, Héctor EmilioObjective: To systematize evidence on the use of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in healthcare to reduce risks to patient safety. Materials and Methods: This research was designed as a systematic review, summarizing results from research studies and providing evidence on the use of a specific intervention. A total of 25 scientific articles were reviewed, which were subjected to selection criteria, resulting in a sample of 10 articles found in databases. Results: The evidence found indicates that 100% (n=10/10) supports the use of FMEA to reduce risks to patient safety. The results also show that in terms of the quality of scientific evidence, 50% (n=5/10) are pre-experimental studies, 30% (n=3/10) are descriptive studies, and 20% (n=2/10) are cohort studies. Regarding the origin of the evidence, 50% comes from Spain, 10% from Colombia, 10% from Argentina, 10% from Israel, 10% from India, and 10% from Iran. Conclusion: The use of FMEA is evidenced as effective in reducing risks to patient safety.
