Examinando por Autor "Ramirez Herrera, Paulita Mavel"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of continuous insulin infusion therapy vs. subcutaneous insulin injection in patients with Diabetes Mellitus.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-07-08) Poma Solano, Diana Guisella; Ramirez Herrera, Paulita Mavel; Gamarra Bustillos, Carlos
Objectives: To analyze and systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of continuous insulin infusion vs subcutaneous insulin injection in patients with diabetes mellitus to regulate and maintain glucose levels. Materials and Methods: Systematic review, the search was restricted to full-text articles, and the selected articles underwent critical reading, using the Grade System to identify their level of evidence. In the final selection, 10 articles were chosen, of which 60% (6) are randomized trials, 30% (3) are systematic reviews, and 10% (1) are cohort studies, all of high evidence quality and strong recommendation strength. Results: Of the 10 articles reviewed, 90% indicate that continuous insulin infusion is more effective in regulating glucose levels compared to subcutaneous insulin injection in patients with Diabetes Mellitus I and II, while 10% of the articles do not specify in which type of diabetes it is more effective. Conclusion: Of the 10 articles reviewed, (n=9/10) indicate that continuous insulin infusion is more effective in regulating glucose levels compared to subcutaneous insulin injection in Diabetes Mellitus I and II, (n=1/10) does not specify in which type of diabetes continuous insulin infusion is more effective.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of continuous insulin infusion therapy vs. subcutaneous insulin injection in patients with Diabetes Mellitus.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-07-08) Poma Solano, Diana Guisella; Ramirez Herrera, Paulita Mavel; Gamarra Bustillos, Carlos
Objectives: To analyze and systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of continuous insulin infusion vs subcutaneous insulin injection in patients with diabetes mellitus to regulate and maintain glucose levels. Materials and Methods: Systematic review, the search was restricted to full-text articles, and the selected articles underwent critical reading, using the Grade System to identify their level of evidence. In the final selection, 10 articles were chosen, of which 60% (6) are randomized trials, 30% (3) are systematic reviews, and 10% (1) are cohort studies, all of high evidence quality and strong recommendation strength. Results: Of the 10 articles reviewed, 90% indicate that continuous insulin infusion is more effective in regulating glucose levels compared to subcutaneous insulin injection in patients with Diabetes Mellitus I and II, while 10% of the articles do not specify in which type of diabetes it is more effective. Conclusion: Of the 10 articles reviewed, (n=9/10) indicate that continuous insulin infusion is more effective in regulating glucose levels compared to subcutaneous insulin injection in Diabetes Mellitus I and II, (n=1/10) does not specify in which type of diabetes continuous insulin infusion is more effective.