Examinando por Autor "Rodriguez Sevillano, Leonor"

Seleccione resultados tecleando las primeras letras
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Quality of professional life and burnout syndrome in nursing staff working in the private clinic Jesús del Norte, Lima 2018.
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-07-09) Rodriguez Sevillano, Leonor; Perez Siguas, Rosa Eva
    Materials and Methods: Observational and retrospective systematic review of national and international research articles, which were obtained through a search in databases: PubMed, Wolters Kluwer, Wiley Online Library. These articles were selected after being subjected to a critical reading, using the GRADE evaluation to identify their level of evidence. Results: The study indicates that 70% (n=7/10) of the articles suggest that minimally invasive surgery is more effective compared to conventional surgery in adults post lumbar surgery. 10% (n=1/10) indicate that both surgeries are effective, while 20% (n=2/10) state that statistically the results are inconclusive and further studies are needed. Conclusion: Of the 10 articles reviewed, it is concluded that minimally invasive surgery is more effective than conventional surgery in post lumbar surgery patients.
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Sanitary crisis and the fundamental right to good public administration: case of legal registries in Peru.
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2020-12-26) Rodriguez Sevillano, Leonor; Cabrera Espezua, Jeannelly Paola
    The present research work aims to determine the level of patient satisfaction with the care provided by health personnel in the Emergency Department of the San Gabriel Clinic. Methodology; the study has a quantitative approach, descriptive, non-experimental, cross-sectional design, the population is made up of 500 participants, so 100% of the population was worked with. The technique used is the survey (SERVQUAL SCALE) that was developed by Vela Rengifo, this instrument comprises 22 items and is divided into 5 dimensions, said instrument is validated by expert judgment. The reliability of the instrument was estimated by a pilot test of 217 patients whose reliability is 0.92%.