Examinando por Autor "Zavaleta Alvarez, Vanessa"

Seleccione resultados tecleando las primeras letras
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Lachos Ospina, Johanna Paola; Zavaleta Alvarez, Vanessa; Pretell Aguilar, Rosa Maria
    Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the 10 scientific articles found in the following databases: Scielo, PubMed, Medigraphic, and Springer. These allowed us to find 10 scientific pieces of evidence. The search was restricted to full-text articles, and the selected articles were subjected to a critical reading using the GRADE system evaluation to identify their level of evidence. Among the 10 pieces of evidence, the types of research are as follows: 40% (4/10) quasi-experimental, 20% (2/10) systematic review and meta-analysis, 20% (2/10) cohort studies, 10% (1/10) descriptive, and 10% (1/10) controlled clinical trial. Results: In the final selection, 10 articles were chosen. We found that 100% (n=10/10) of the evidence suggests that laparoscopic hysterectomy is more effective than conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients, as we observed: shorter hospital stay (50%), less postoperative pain (10%), less bleeding (10%), lower cost (5%), better aesthetics and mental health (15%), and improvement in quality of life (10%). Conclusions: The 10 scientific articles reviewed all conclude that laparoscopic hysterectomy is more effective than conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients.
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Lachos Ospina, Johanna Paola; Zavaleta Alvarez, Vanessa; Pretell Aguilar, Rosa Maria
    Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the 10 scientific articles found in the following databases: Scielo, PubMed, Medigraphic, and Springer. These allowed us to find 10 scientific pieces of evidence. The search was restricted to full-text articles, and the selected articles were subjected to a critical reading using the GRADE system evaluation to identify their level of evidence. Among the 10 pieces of evidence, the types of research are as follows: 40% (4/10) quasi-experimental, 20% (2/10) systematic review and meta-analysis, 20% (2/10) cohort studies, 10% (1/10) descriptive, and 10% (1/10) controlled clinical trial. Results: In the final selection, 10 articles were chosen. We found that 100% (n=10/10) of the evidence suggests that laparoscopic hysterectomy is more effective than conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients, as we observed: shorter hospital stay (50%), less postoperative pain (10%), less bleeding (10%), lower cost (5%), better aesthetics and mental health (15%), and improvement in quality of life (10%). Conclusions: The 10 scientific articles reviewed all conclude that laparoscopic hysterectomy is more effective than conventional hysterectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in postoperative patients.