Examinando por Materia "Anesthesia"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso abierto
Evaluation of the location of the mandibular lingula and mandibular foramen with respect to the lower occlusal plane and the anterior border of the ramus of the mandible during the period 2017-2021
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2022-08-15) Meléndez Vela, Anita Milagros; Vergara Pinto, Brenda Roxana
Materials and Methods: In this observational, analytical, cross-sectional study, 274 digital panoramic radiographs were analyzed, belonging to patients aged 6 to 45 years. A statistical analysis was conducted, with a 95% confidence level (significance level 0.05). Results: In the study, 174 patients were female. The mean distance of the LM (Lower Molar) to the PO (Occlusal Plane) ranged from 4.81 mm to 12.01 mm, while the distance of the FM (Mental Foramen) to the PO ranged from 0.92 mm to 7.91 mm. The mean distance of the LM to the BA (Bony Arch) ranged from 12.65 mm to 15.46 mm, and the distance of the FM to the BA ranged from 13.96 mm to 17.28 mm. A significant difference (p<0.05) was found in all distances according to age and between the LM-BA and FM-BA distances according to sex. Conclusions: The anesthesia technique for blocking the inferior alveolar nerve should be applied between the lower occlusal plane level, not exceeding 12.01 mm and 7.91 mm (LM and FM respectively), with a needle insertion depth ranging between 12.65 mm - 15.46 mm and 13.96 mm - 17.28 mm (LM and FM respectively).
Acceso abierto
Sedoanalgesia and Pain of the Patient Submitted to Mechanical Ventilation in the Critical Emergency Units of Two Hospitals in Lima - 2022.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2022-07-10) Huamán Solórzano, Yul Roberth; Mori Castro, Jaime Alberto
The main objective of this study is to determine the relationship between sedation and pain in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the critical emergency units of two hospitals in Lima, 2022. Materials and methods: A basic, quantitative, observational, correlational and cross-sectional research will be carried out on a sample of 42 adult patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the critical emergency units of two hospitals in Lima. They will be administered 2 rating scales using the observation technique: The Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS), which evaluates sedation and pain in critically ill patients with 3 dimensions: Agitation, Cooperation/calm, and sedation. Likewise, the second scale called Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), which assesses pain intensity in non-communicative patients with 4 dimensions: facial expression, body movements, muscle tension, adaptation to the ventilator.