Examinando por Materia "Appendectomy"

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4

Acceso abierto
Cuidado humanizado de enfermería y recuperación en pacientes post operados de apendicectomía, Hospital Eleazar Guzmán Barrón, Nuevo Chimbote 2024
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2024-09-22) Jara Vasquez, Rosmeri Ebelin; Fernández Rengifo, Werther Fernando
El objetivo de la investigación es determinar la relación que existe entre el cuidado humanizado de enfermería y recuperación en pacientes post operados de apendicectomía, Hospital Eleazar Guzmán Barrón, Nuevo Chimbote 2024, la metodología es de método inductivo- deductivo, de enfoque cuantitativo, de tipo descriptiva correlacional de corte transversal, observacional, de diseño experimental, esta conformado por los pacientes del servicio de cirugía, para la recolección de datos se utilizó dos instrumentos denominados el cuidado humanizado de enfermeria y recuperación de pacientes post operados en lo cual cuentan con una validez y confiabilidad.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of abdominal drainage in preventing intraperitoneal abscesses in post-appendectomy patients
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2020-01-19) Acevedo Sebastián, Fiorella Yamile; Pelaez Claros, Alisson Consuelo; Pretell Aguilar, Rosa María
OBJECTIVE: Systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of abdominal drainage to prevent intraperitoneal abscess in patients after complicated appendectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The systematic review of the 10 scientific articles on the effectiveness of abdominal drainage to prevent intraperitoneal abscess in patients after complicated appendectomy, were obtained from the following databases Epistemonikos, Pubmed, Scielo, Dialnet, Iasj.net, Corea.net, Sciencedrect and Google scholar. They were analyzed according to the Grade scale to determine the strength and quality of the evidence. Of the 10 articles, 40% (4/10) correspond to the methodological design of case-control studies, 30% (3/10) to a Retrospective Cohort Study, 20% (2/10) to Randomized Controlled Trials and 10% (1/10) a Systematic review. Being 30% High Quality and 70% Moderate Quality. RESULTS: Of the 10 articles reviewed, 100% (10/10) demonstrate that abdominal drainage is not effective in preventing intraperitoneal abscess in patients after complicated appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The present systematic review concludes that 10 of 10 evidence indicates that abdominal drainage is not effective in preventing intraperitoneal abscess in patients after complicated appendectomy.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in obese patients, to reduce complications and hospital stay
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2021-10-13) Lipa Gutierrez, Ruth Nohemi; Requis Delgado, Sonia Jasmin; Pretell Aguilar, Rosa María
Objective: Systematize the evidence linked to the effectiveness of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in obese patients to reduce complications and hospital stay. Methodology: The systematic review of the 10 scientific articles were from the following databases: Epistemonikos, Scielo, Cochrane Plus, Pubmed, Medline. They allowed us to find 10 scientific evidence. Of all the evidence, the type of research belongs to descriptive 60% (6/10), meta-analysis 20% (2/10), cohort 10% (1/10) and systematic review 10% (1/10). Likewise, 60% (6/10) correspond to the United States, the United Kingdom 10% (1/10), Chile 10% (1/10), Mexico 10% (1/10) and Argentina 10% (1/10). ). Results: 90% (n= 09/10) of the evidence indicates that laparoscopic appendectomy is more effective than open appendectomy for reducing complications and hospital stay in obese patients. On the other hand, 10% demonstrate that appendectomy is not effective compared to the open technique, since the laparoscopic technique did not show a benefit over the open approach, both in complications and hospital stay. Conclusion: 9 out of 10 evidence demonstrates that laparoscopic appendectomy is more effective than open appendectomy in reducing complications and hospital stay in obese patients.
Acceso abierto
Efficacy of conventional surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in patients with appendectomy
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-11-12) Guerrero Macha, Patricia Mabel; Paredes Ursula, Cecilia Margaret; Calsin Pacompia, Wilmer
Materials and methods: Systematic observational and retrospective review, the search has been restricted to articles with full text and the selected articles were subjected to a critical reading, using the Grade evaluation to identify their level of evidence. In the final selection, 10 articles were chosen, the majority having been analyzed according to research design: longitudinal studies with 50%, systematic review with 20%, descriptive studies with 20% and cohort studies with 10%. Results: It was evident in the research reviewed that 70% of the effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery is greater than conventional surgery, since the results presented benefits in terms of decreased hospital stay (60%), less pain in the recovery (40%) and prompt reintegration to daily activities (30%), on the other hand, 30% of the studies reveal that both procedures are effective, and that although the laparoscopic approach presents fewer alterations in the surgical wound It still presents a higher economic cost compared to the conventional one, and in terms of the other variables, no major difference was found in both procedures. Conclusion: It is concluded that laparoscopic surgery is more effective compared to conventional surgery since it presents greater benefits.