Examinando por Materia "Dopamine"

Seleccione resultados tecleando las primeras letras
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Efficacy of noradrenaline compared to dopamine in reducing adverse events in the treatment of patients with septic shock.
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-07-08) Patricio Centeno, Luis Alberto; Lugo Ostos, Evila Isabel; Rivera Lozada de Bonilla, Oriana
    The Systematic Review, analysis unit, primary original studies. Databases used: Intramed, Pubmed. Ten articles were selected, of which 80% are systematic reviews and high-quality meta-analyses from countries such as China, Israel, the United States, Brazil, and Australia, and 20% are clinical trial articles from the United States. Results: In the 10 articles, it was evidenced that 80% (8/10) of the authors agree that the use of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock presented fewer cardiac adverse events, and decreased the arrhythmia rate, compared to the use of dopamine. Conclusions: The reviewed articles showed that norepinephrine is more effective than dopamine as it does not present adverse effects in the treatment of patients with septic shock, and they state that dopamine is not as effective compared to norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock due to adverse effects such as cardiac arrhythmias and increased mortality.
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Efficacy of noradrenaline compared with dopamine in reducing adverse events in the treatment of patients with septic shock.
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-07-08) Lugo Ostos, Evila Isabel; Rivera Lozada de Bonilla, Oriana
    Systematic Review, unit of analysis, original primary studies. Databases: Intramed, PubMed. Ten articles were selected, of which 80% were high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses from countries such as China, Israel, the United States, Brazil, and Australia. The remaining 20% were clinical trial articles from the United States. Results: The 10 articles revealed that 80% (8/10) of the authors agree that the use of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock resulted in fewer adverse cardiac events and reduced arrhythmia rates compared to dopamine use. Conclusions: The reviewed articles show that norepinephrine is more effective than dopamine in treating septic shock, as it does not present adverse effects, such as cardiac arrhythmias, and is associated with lower mortality rates. In contrast, dopamine is less effective compared to norepinephrine due to its adverse effects like arrhythmias and increased mortality.