Examinando por Materia "Laryngeal Masks"

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3

Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of I-gel mask versus laryngeal mask in adult patients induced to general anesthesia
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-03-25) Peve Suarez, Liliana Cecilia; Soto Barrios, Erika Babett; Calsin Pacompia, Wilmer
Objective: To analyze and systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of the I-gel mask versus the laryngeal mask in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This study is qualitative in nature, and the study design is a systematic review. The population consisted of 15 articles, and the sample included 10 scientific articles published and indexed in scientific databases. The instruments used were searches in databases such as Lipecs, Lilacs, Scielo, Cochrane Plus, Pubmed, Medline, Epistemonikos, and EBSCO. The articles were evaluated using the GRADE method, which assesses the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Results: 30% of the articles are from India; 20% from South Korea, 10% from China, 10% from Egypt, 10% from Spain, 10% from the United Kingdom, and 10% from Turkey. In terms of study designs, 70% were randomized clinical trials, 20% were meta-analyses, and 10% were systematic reviews. Conclusions: 80% of the evidence supports that the use of the I-gel mask is effective compared to the laryngeal mask due to the shorter insertion time, better seal, and less pain compared to the laryngeal mask, which causes nausea, vomiting, and sore throat in patients. 20% conclude that the laryngeal mask is more effective compared to the I-gel mask because it favors a better index of suitability for controlled ventilation and better sealing against leakage pressure.
Acceso abierto
Efficacy of the endotracheal tube compared to the laryngeal mask in post-operative adult patients in reducing pain, bronchaspiration, and nausea.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-08-26) Calixto Ichu, Milina Lili; Castillo Misagel, Paola Angelica; Calsin Pacompia, Wilmer
The study is quantitative in nature, and the study design is a systematic review, with a population consisting of 18 articles, and 10 articles were selected for the study sample; the sources used were Cochrane Library, British Medical Journal, PubMed, Lancet, Wiley Online Library, Health Systems Evidence, Public Health Group, Scielo, and Epistemonikos; with critical evaluation under the GRADE method for each article; of which 30% were from Lebanon, and 10% from China, Iran, India, Australia, Colombia, and Canada, as appropriate; in terms of the type of study, 70% were quantitative and 30% qualitative; the design was 50% clinical trials, 40% systematic reviews, and 10% meta-analysis. This systematic review concludes that 70% of the articles demonstrate that the laryngeal mask is more effective than the endotracheal tube, as it presents fewer complications in post-operative adult patients in reducing pain, bronchoaspiration, and nausea. In contrast, 20% conclude that both the endotracheal tube and the laryngeal mask are equally effective in post-operative patients in reducing pain, bronchoaspiration, and nausea, and only 10% found that the endotracheal tube is more effective.
Acceso abierto
Efficacy of the endotracheal tube compared to the laryngeal mask in post-operative adult patients in reducing pain, bronchaspiration, and nausea.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-08-26) Castillo Misagel, Paola Angelica; Calsin Pacompia, Wilmer
The study is quantitative in nature, and the study design is a systematic review, with a population consisting of 18 articles, and 10 articles were selected for the study sample; the sources used were Cochrane Library, British Medical Journal, PubMed, Lancet, Wiley Online Library, Health Systems Evidence, Public Health Group, Scielo, and Epistemonikos; with critical evaluation under the GRADE method for each article; of which 30% were from Lebanon, and 10% from China, Iran, India, Australia, Colombia, and Canada, as appropriate; in terms of the type of study, 70% were quantitative and 30% qualitative; the design was 50% clinical trials, 40% systematic reviews, and 10% meta-analysis. This systematic review concludes that 70% of the articles demonstrate that the laryngeal mask is more effective than the endotracheal tube, as it presents fewer complications in post-operative adult patients in reducing pain, bronchoaspiration, and nausea. In contrast, 20% conclude that both the endotracheal tube and the laryngeal mask are equally effective in post-operative patients in reducing pain, bronchoaspiration, and nausea, and only 10% found that the endotracheal tube is more effective.