Examinando por Materia "Pneumothorax"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso abierto
Efficacy of chest tube drainage versus needle aspiration in reducing hospital stay in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2019-09-01) Perales Cerrón, Karina Edith; Barrientos Jauregui, Henrry Alexander; Matta Solis, Hernan Hugo
Objective: Systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of chest tube drainage versus needle aspiration to reduce hospital stay in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Material and Methods: Systematic observational and retrospective review, subjected to critical reading and applying the GRADE evaluation system to identify the degree of evidence of the articles published in the following databases: Epistemonikos, Sciencedirect, Cochrane, Researchgate, Pubmed. Of the 10 articles systematically reviewed, 10% (n= 1/10) are meta-analyses, 50% (n= 5/10) are systematic reviews, 20% (n= 2/10) are randomized clinical trials and the 20% (n= 2/10) are cohort studies and come from the countries of China (10%), Australia (10%), Korea (10%), France (10%), Netherlands (10%), United States (10%), Poland (10%), Norway (10%), Japan (10%) and Spain (10%). Results: 100% indicate the aspiration with a needle is more effective than chest tube drainage in reducing hospital stay in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Conclusion: Needle aspiration is more effective in reducing hospital stay in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax, indicating 100% (n=10/10).
Acceso abierto
Efficacy of percutaneous aspiration versus drainage of the tube for the treatment of patients with pneumothorax
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2019-07-14) Gaona Torres, Delia Cori; Cárdenas de Fernández, María Hilda
Objective: To systematize the evidence on the use of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in healthcare to reduce patient safety risks. Material and Methods: This research is designed as a systematic review, which summarizes research study results and provides evidence on the use of a specific intervention. A total of 25 scientific articles were reviewed for this investigation, which were subjected to selection criteria, resulting in a sample of 10 articles found in databases. Results: The evidence found indicates that 100% (n=10/10) supports the use of FMEA to reduce patient safety risks. The results also indicate that regarding the quality of scientific evidence, 50% (n=5/10) are pre-experimental studies, 30% (n=3/10) are descriptive studies, and 20% (n=2/10) are cohort studies. Regarding the geographical origin of the evidence, Spain accounts for 50%, followed by Colombia (10%), Argentina (10%), Israel (10%), India (10%), and Iran (10%). Conclusion: The use of FMEA to reduce patient safety risks is evidenced.