Examinando por Materia "Positive-Pressure Respiration"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Acceso abierto Effectiveness of the use of nasal continuous positive pressure ventilation versus intermittent nasal positive pressure ventilation for the prevention and control of respiratory pathologies in preterm neonates(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2020-07-26) Huamancolí Torres, Etty Indira; Urrutia Brandan, Marisol; Fernández Rengifo, Werther FernandoThe present work positively expands the treatment alternatives. The evidence suggests that the early application of intermittent positive ventilation reduces re-intubation, ventilations and mechanical ventilation time, thus allowing adequate management of the pathologies of premature neonates, as a result of research into the effectiveness of its use by Nasal continuous positive pressure versus intermittent nasal positive pressure ventilation in the prevention and control of respiratory pathologies in premature neonates, we conclude that nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation is the most effective.Ítem Acceso abierto Positive pressure continues in respiratory routes in patients with obstructive apnea and cardiac insufficiency is effective to avoid intrahospital complications(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2019-04-07) Lopez Marquez, Isabel Yovana; Quispe Napa, Cecilia Jesús; Pretell Aguilar, Rosa MariaObjective: To systematize evidence on the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of international research studies was conducted, obtained through searches in databases such as Epistemonikos, NCBI, PubMed, Elsevier, Google Scholar, and Scielo. These studies were selected and analyzed using the GRADE system to determine their respective levels of evidence. Articles were identified using DECS and MESH descriptors for searches in Spanish and English, respectively. Among the reviewed articles, 50% (5/10) are from the USA, 30% (3/10) from China, and 20% (2/10) from England and Japan. Results: Seventy percent of the studies reviewed indicate that CPAP treatment is effective in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure, while 30% show that CPAP treatment is ineffective in such patients. Conclusions: Seven out of ten pieces of evidence studied conclude that CPAP treatment is effective in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure, while three out of ten conclude that CPAP treatment is not effective for these conditions.
