Examinando por Materia "Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular"

Seleccione resultados tecleando las primeras letras
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-09-15) Quilca Calatayud, Gissella Mercedes; Ramirez Aliaga, Roxana Yanis; Remuzgo Artezano, Anika
    Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 studies were selected. The systematic review of the 10 scientific articles on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure was conducted using the following databases: Lilacs, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Plus. It included 1 meta-analysis, 1 systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 systematic review, 2 experimental studies, 4 randomized clinical trials, and 1 cross-sectional study. Results: Of the 10 articles reviewed, 90% (n=9/10) agree that there is sufficient scientific evidence that high-flow hemodialysis has greater benefits than low-flow hemodialysis in preventing or delaying the onset of long-term complications in the evolutionary process of patients undergoing dialysis. 10% (n=1/10) concludes that there are no significant differences between the use of high-flow hemodialysis and low-flow hemodialysis. Conclusions: The systematically reviewed articles provide evidence that high-flow hemodialysis is more effective than low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure.
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-09-15) Quilca Calatayud, Gissella Mercedes; Ramirez Aliaga, Roxana Yanis; Remuzgo Artezano, Anika
    Objective: To systematize the evidence on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure. Materials and Methods: A total of 10 studies were selected. The systematic review of the 10 scientific articles on the effectiveness of high-flow hemodialysis versus low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure was conducted using the following databases: Lilacs, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Plus. It included 1 meta-analysis, 1 systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 systematic review, 2 experimental studies, 4 randomized clinical trials, and 1 cross-sectional study. Results: Of the 10 articles reviewed, 90% (n=9/10) agree that there is sufficient scientific evidence that high-flow hemodialysis has greater benefits than low-flow hemodialysis in preventing or delaying the onset of long-term complications in the evolutionary process of patients undergoing dialysis. 10% (n=1/10) concludes that there are no significant differences between the use of high-flow hemodialysis and low-flow hemodialysis. Conclusions: The systematically reviewed articles provide evidence that high-flow hemodialysis is more effective than low-flow hemodialysis in reducing cardiovascular complications in patients with end-stage renal failure.