Examinando por Materia "Primíparas"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso abierto
Breastfeeding in primiparous women bibliographic review
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2022-06-16) La Torre Chalco, Catherine Cristina; Salcedo Suárez, Katty Leticia
Objective: To describe the scientific evidence on exclusive breastfeeding in primiparas. Materials and methods: The methodology used in this study is a bibliographic review. The sample consisted of 31 articles published in the following virtual libraries: Scielo, Lilacs, and Sciencedirect. Results: 65% of the reviewed studies used a descriptive methodology, 29% used an analytical methodology, and 19% used a review methodology. The negative impact of exclusive breastfeeding in primiparas included respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, while the positive impact favored optimal growth in children. The existence of beliefs about exclusive breastfeeding in primiparas included the consumption of unhealthy foods for proper milk production, and the practice of exclusive breastfeeding in primiparas was adequate. Conclusions: There is scientific evidence on the consequences, beliefs, and practices of exclusive breastfeeding in primiparas.
Acceso abierto
Comparative study of complications associated with the use of versus routine episiotomy the restrictive episiotomy in primíparas atended at the Hipolito Unanue National Hospital, 2019
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2019-11-26) Silverio Piñola, Rubi Naysha; Marín Guevara, Leticia Gloria
Objective: To determine the complications associated with routine episiotomy versus restrictive episiotomy in primiparous women attended at the Hipólito Unanue National Hospital, 2019. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational cross-sectional case-control study with a sample of 216 primiparous women attended at the Hipólito Unanue National Hospital. Results: 42.6% of the primiparous women were between 20-25 years old, 63.4% were cohabiting, 68.1% were homemakers, 53.7% had completed secondary education, and 58.3% came from the coastal region. Additionally, 64.4% of the women surveyed did not attend psychoprophylaxis sessions, 65.3% had pregnancies lasting between 39 to 40 weeks, and 71.3% received complete prenatal care. 48.6% of the newborns weighed between 3000 and 3999g. Routine episiotomies were performed by medical interns (23.4%), while restrictive episiotomies were performed by gynecologists-obstetricians (27.3%). Complications of routine episiotomy included first-degree perineal tears (39%), vulvoperineal hematomas (0.9%), vulvoperineal edema (19.4%), partial suture dehiscence (2%), and severe perineal pain (38%). Complications of restrictive episiotomy included first-degree perineal tears (29.6%), vulvoperineal edema (13.9%), and moderate perineal pain (30.6%). Conclusion: Routine episiotomy resulted in more complications compared to restrictive episiotomy in primiparous women attended at the Hipólito Unanue National Hospital.