Examinando por Autor "Meléndez López, Edwin Moisés"

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3

Acceso abierto
Efficacy of the use of convective method (hemodiafiltration) compared to the use of diffusive method (hemodialysis) in reducing mortality (general and cardiovascular) in adult patients with end-stage renal failure.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-07-08) Meléndez López, Edwin Moisés; Matta Solis, Hernan Hugo
Objective: Analyze and systematize the evidence found regarding the effectiveness of the convective method (Hemodiafiltration) vs. the use of diffusive method modalities (Hemodialysis) to decrease mortality (general and cardiovascular) in adult patients with terminal chronic kidney failure. Materials and Methods: Systematic review, Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, with 10 scientific evidences obtained from the following databases: Epistemonikos and Pubmed. Therefore, 80% (8/10) are systematic reviews, 10% (1/10) are non-randomized trials, and 10% (1/10) are randomized trials. Of the total evidence, 20% (2/10) come from Romania, followed by 20% (2/10) from Spain, 10% (1/10) from Argentina, 10% (1/10) from Turkey, 10% (1/10) from the U.S., 10% (1/10) from Germany, 10% (1/10) from Australia, and 10% (1/10) from the Netherlands. Results: 70% of the evidence found indicate that the use of the convective method (HDF) is more effective than the use of the diffusive method (HD) in reducing mortality (cardiovascular or general) in adult patients with terminal chronic kidney failure, while 30% indicate no significant difference between the two renal replacement therapies. Conclusion: Of the evidence, 7 out of 10 indicate that the use of the convective method (Hemodiafiltration) is more effective than the use of the diffusive method (Hemodialysis) in reducing mortality (cardiovascular and general) in adult patients with terminal chronic kidney failure, while 3 out of 10 indicate no significant difference.
Acceso abierto
Efficacy of the use of convective method (hemodiafiltration) compared to the use of diffusive method (hemodialysis) in reducing mortality (general and cardiovascular) in adult patients with end-stage renal failure.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-07-08) Bendezú Moreno, Wilma Erika; Meléndez López, Edwin Moisés; Matta Solis, Hernan Hugo
Objective: Analyze and systematize the evidence found regarding the effectiveness of the convective method (Hemodiafiltration) vs. the use of diffusive method modalities (Hemodialysis) to decrease mortality (general and cardiovascular) in adult patients with terminal chronic kidney failure. Materials and Methods: Systematic review, Randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, with 10 scientific evidences obtained from the following databases: Epistemonikos and Pubmed. Therefore, 80% (8/10) are systematic reviews, 10% (1/10) are non-randomized trials, and 10% (1/10) are randomized trials. Of the total evidence, 20% (2/10) come from Romania, followed by 20% (2/10) from Spain, 10% (1/10) from Argentina, 10% (1/10) from Turkey, 10% (1/10) from the U.S., 10% (1/10) from Germany, 10% (1/10) from Australia, and 10% (1/10) from the Netherlands. Results: 70% of the evidence found indicate that the use of the convective method (HDF) is more effective than the use of the diffusive method (HD) in reducing mortality (cardiovascular or general) in adult patients with terminal chronic kidney failure, while 30% indicate no significant difference between the two renal replacement therapies. Conclusion: Of the evidence, 7 out of 10 indicate that the use of the convective method (Hemodiafiltration) is more effective than the use of the diffusive method (Hemodialysis) in reducing mortality (cardiovascular and general) in adult patients with terminal chronic kidney failure, while 3 out of 10 indicate no significant difference.
Acceso abierto
Quality of life in patients with terminal chronic renal failure, with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis treatment, nephrology service, Alberto Sabogal Sologuren National Hospital – Essalud, Callao
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 1905-07-09) Meléndez López, Edwin Moisés; Taboada Masabel, Daniel Angel; Krederdt Araujo, Sherin Luz
Objective: To establish the quality of life of patients with terminal chronic renal failure treated with either Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis. Nephrology Service. Alberto Sabogal Sologuren National Hospital. Materials and methods: The study according to its tendency was quantitative, according to its orientation it was applied, according to the time of occurrence of the events investigated it was prospective, according to its period and the sequence of the data it was transversal and according to its analysis and scope of its results It was descriptive, while the study was unpublished. Results: Quality of life in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis was moderately healthy in a little less than half (45.24%) and in a little more than half (54.55%) respectively. The dimensions in HD and DIPAC, in Physical Function, Body Pain, Emotional Role and Mental Health, in both treatments the quality of life is moderately healthy in a little more than half (52%), the General Health and Function dimensions Social quality of life is moderately healthy, a little more than half (57%) and a little less than half (41%) respectively. Conclusion: The statistical hypothesis is confirmed. There is a difference in the quality of life in both treatments, being greater in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis.