Examinando por Autor "Paucar Espinoza, Gian Carlos"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of renal transplantation from a living donor vs. cadaveric donor transplantation for the survival of the graft and recipient in adult patients with terminal chronic renal disease.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-11-04) Carrión Alcalde, Arlene Melisa; Paucar Espinoza, Gian Carlos; Glenni Garay, Zarely Zabeli
Material and Methods: A systematic search of 10 scientific articles was conducted in the following databases: Scielo, Elsevier, Pubmed, Nefrology Journal, Biomedical Journal, and Mexican and Colombian Urology Journal. The research design is as follows: 30% (3/10) systematic reviews, and 70% (7/10) cohort studies. 30% (3/10) of the evidence is of high quality, and 70% (7/10) is of moderate quality. Furthermore, 40% of the evidence comes from Spain, 20% from Cuba, 20% from Colombia, 10% from Mexico, and 10% from Chile. Results: 100% (n=10/10) of the scientific evidence consulted indicates that kidney transplantation from a living donor is more effective than kidney transplantation from a deceased donor for graft and recipient survival in adult patients with end-stage renal disease, proving to be the best treatment, as it results in fewer complications and improved quality of life. Conclusion: Kidney transplantation from a living donor is more effective than kidney transplantation from a deceased donor for graft and recipient survival in adult patients with end-stage renal disease.
Acceso abierto
Satisfaction with nursing care in patients attending the diabetes mellitus prevention and control program at the Huarupampa Health Center, Huaraz-Ancash.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2015) Paucar Espinoza, Gian Carlos; Rojas Reyes, Ruth Rosario; Krederdt Araujo, Sherin Luz
To determine the level of satisfaction with nursing care among patients attending the Diabetes Mellitus Prevention and Control Program at the "Huarupampa" Health Center in Huaraz, Ancash. The study was quantitative, exploratory descriptive design, and therefore novel at the mentioned center. It was cross-sectional, with non-probabilistic sampling. The Rating Scale was used as the instrument, applied only once with informed consent. The degree of satisfaction among patients with type II diabetes who attended the Program was determined, with nearly all (99.35%) being satisfied. In the "Nurse's treatment of the patient" dimension, more than half (57.42%) of the patients were moderately satisfied. In the "Technical quality of care" dimension, a little less than half (47.74%) of the patients were satisfied, and the other half was divided between dissatisfied (27.74%) and satisfied (24.52%). In the "Physical environment where care is given," two-thirds (69.03%) of the patients were dissatisfied, with no patients being satisfied. In the "Continuity of nursing care" dimension, all patients were dissatisfied. Finally, in the "Care outcomes" dimension, more than two-thirds (72.90%) of the patients were moderately satisfied.