Examinando por Autor "Vasquez Cabanillas, Leyla Nisely"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis compared to hemodialysis in improving survival in patients with chronic kidney failure.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Carbajal Huamán, Shirley Celine; Vasquez Cabanillas, Leyla Nisely; Pretell Aguilar, Rosa Maria
Objective: To systematize the available evidence on the effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis compared to hemodialysis in improving the survival of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Materials and Methods: This study is a systematic review, observational, and retrospective design that synthesizes the results of multiple investigations. They are an essential part of Evidence-Based Nursing (EBN), due to their rigorous methodology, identifying relevant studies to answer specific clinical practice questions. The search was restricted to full-text articles, and the selected articles underwent critical reading, using the Grade system to assign the strength of recommendations. Twelve scientific articles were reviewed, of which 64% (08) were from Spain, 22% (02) from Ecuador, 7% (01) from Argentina, and 7% (01) from Mexico; all studies were systematic reviews, making up 100% (12) of the total. Results: It was found that 64% (07) of the studies show that peritoneal dialysis is more effective than hemodialysis in improving the survival of patients with chronic kidney disease. Additionally, 14.5% (02) show that both are effective in improving survival. Furthermore, 14.5% (02) show that patients treated with hemodialysis had better survival than those treated with peritoneal dialysis. Finally, 7% (01) of the studies did not allow the effectiveness of either treatment to be determined. Conclusions: Peritoneal dialysis is more effective than hemodialysis in improving the survival of patients with chronic kidney disease. Peritoneal dialysis is a more efficient alternative than hemodialysis, being a renal replacement therapy with greater survival rates, as well as better cost-benefit and cost-utility.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis compared to hemodialysis in improving survival in patients with chronic kidney failure.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Carbajal Huamán, Shirley Celine; Vasquez Cabanillas, Leyla Nisely; Pretell Aguilar, Rosa Maria
Objective: To systematize the available evidence on the effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis compared to hemodialysis in improving the survival of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Materials and Methods: This study is a systematic review, observational, and retrospective design that synthesizes the results of multiple investigations. They are an essential part of Evidence-Based Nursing (EBN), due to their rigorous methodology, identifying relevant studies to answer specific clinical practice questions. The search was restricted to full-text articles, and the selected articles underwent critical reading, using the Grade system to assign the strength of recommendations. Twelve scientific articles were reviewed, of which 64% (08) were from Spain, 22% (02) from Ecuador, 7% (01) from Argentina, and 7% (01) from Mexico; all studies were systematic reviews, making up 100% (12) of the total. Results: It was found that 64% (07) of the studies show that peritoneal dialysis is more effective than hemodialysis in improving the survival of patients with chronic kidney disease. Additionally, 14.5% (02) show that both are effective in improving survival. Furthermore, 14.5% (02) show that patients treated with hemodialysis had better survival than those treated with peritoneal dialysis. Finally, 7% (01) of the studies did not allow the effectiveness of either treatment to be determined. Conclusions: Peritoneal dialysis is more effective than hemodialysis in improving the survival of patients with chronic kidney disease. Peritoneal dialysis is a more efficient alternative than hemodialysis, being a renal replacement therapy with greater survival rates, as well as better cost-benefit and cost-utility.