Examinando por Materia "Educational Measurement"

Seleccione resultados tecleando las primeras letras
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Evaluation of learning styles in nursing graduates from a private university in Lima-2020
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2020-09-18) Rosas Torres, Beatriz Felicita; Palomino Taquire, Rewards
    Objective: To determine the learning styles of nursing graduates from a private university in Lima - 2020. Materials and Methods: The study is quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional. The population consisted of 60 nursing graduates from a private university in Lima. The technique used was a survey, and the instrument applied was the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles Questionnaire (CHAEA), which measures learning styles, consisting of 80 items and grouped into four types: active, reflective, theoretical, and pragmatic. Results: Regarding learning styles in nursing graduates, the reflective style predominated with 26.6% (n=16), the theoretical style with 26.6% (n=16), the pragmatic style with 26.6% (n=16), and finally, the active style with 20.2% (n=12). In relation to the types of learning styles, the moderate level predominated in all groups. The active style had 43.3% (n=26), reflective had 51.7% (n=31), theoretical had 45% (n=27), and pragmatic had 33.3% (n=20). Conclusions: In the evaluation of learning styles in nursing graduates, the reflective, theoretical, and pragmatic styles predominated. Regarding the types of learning styles, the moderate level predominated in all groups.
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemAcceso abierto
    Evaluation of nursing competencies in nursing graduates from a Private University of Lima
    (Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2020-09-18) Quispe Peña, Doris Maribel; Palomino Taquire, Rewards
    Objective: To evaluate the nursing competencies of graduates from a private university in Lima. Materials and Methods: The type of study was basic and descriptive, including a total of 63 graduates from the Professional Academic School of Nursing from the 2019-II cohort. The sampling technique was non-probabilistic convenience sampling. The instrument used to assess competency was the EcoEnf scale, which consists of 72 items, with multiple-choice options and a Likert scale. Results: The competencies developed by the 2019-II nursing graduates were inadequately developed in 39.7%. Regarding the diagnostic assessment dimension, "Sometimes" predominated in 36.5% of the nursing graduates. In the planning dimension, the value of "Almost Always" was obtained in 33.3%. In nursing intervention, "Always" was reported in 42.9%. The evaluation and quality dimension showed 28.6% for both "Almost Always" and "Sometimes". In the management dimension, "Almost Always" was reported in 44.4%. In the communication and interpersonal relationships dimension, "Sometimes" was reported by 25.4% of participants. In the attitudes, values, and transfer dimension, "Almost Always" and "Always" were reported in 25.4% of cases for both. Conclusions: It is concluded that the overall competency level among the nursing graduates of the 2019-II cohort was mostly inadequate, followed by an adequate level.