Examinando por Materia "Graft Survival"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2

Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of renal transplantation from a living donor vs. cadaveric donor transplantation for the survival of the graft and recipient in adult patients with terminal chronic renal disease.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-11-04) Carrión Alcalde, Arlene Melisa; Paucar Espinoza, Gian Carlos; Glenni Garay, Zarely Zabeli
Material and Methods: A systematic search of 10 scientific articles was conducted in the following databases: Scielo, Elsevier, Pubmed, Nefrology Journal, Biomedical Journal, and Mexican and Colombian Urology Journal. The research design is as follows: 30% (3/10) systematic reviews, and 70% (7/10) cohort studies. 30% (3/10) of the evidence is of high quality, and 70% (7/10) is of moderate quality. Furthermore, 40% of the evidence comes from Spain, 20% from Cuba, 20% from Colombia, 10% from Mexico, and 10% from Chile. Results: 100% (n=10/10) of the scientific evidence consulted indicates that kidney transplantation from a living donor is more effective than kidney transplantation from a deceased donor for graft and recipient survival in adult patients with end-stage renal disease, proving to be the best treatment, as it results in fewer complications and improved quality of life. Conclusion: Kidney transplantation from a living donor is more effective than kidney transplantation from a deceased donor for graft and recipient survival in adult patients with end-stage renal disease.
Acceso abierto
Efficacy of renal transplantation in decreasing the risk of graft loss for survival in pediatric patients.
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-03-25) De la Cruz Quispe, Sonia Esther; Perez Siguas, Rosa Eva
Objective: To systematize and evidence the efficacy of kidney transplantation in the reduction of the risk of graft loss for survival in pediatric patients. Materials and Methods: The study is quantitative, with a systematic review design. The population consisted of 39 articles that were reviewed, and 10 scientific articles were selected as the sample. Of these, 20% (n=2/10) were systematic reviews, 10% (n=1/10) were systematic review and meta-analysis, and 70% (n=7/10) were cohort studies. According to the quality of evidence, 30% was rated as high and 70% as moderate. In terms of the strength of recommendations, 30% were strong and 70% were weak, based on the country where the research was conducted. Results: The reviewed articles show that 40% (n=4/10) indicate the efficacy of renal replacement therapy in the risk of graft loss for survival in pediatric patients. Another 40% (n=4/10) state that it is partially effective, and 20% (n=2/10) state it is not effective. Conclusion: It is concluded that 40% (n=4/10) indicates that renal replacement therapy is partially effective in the risk of graft loss for survival in pediatric patients.