Examinando por Materia "Resección Transuretral de la Próstata"

Mostrando 1 - 3 de 3

Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of laser vaporization technique versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Guzmán Rodríguez, Fiorella; Montesinos Benites, Stefanie Pamela; Matta Solis, Hernán Hugo
Objective: To evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review that synthesizes the results of multiple primary studies. The sample is based on a review of 10 scientific articles published in the scientific databases LILACS, SCIELO, LIPECS, EPISTEMONIKOS, and the Cochrane Review, with the primary focus on the efficacy of laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients. Among the 10 pieces of evidence, 40% (4/10) were systematic reviews, 20% (2/10) were randomized prospective studies, 10% (1/10) was a meta-analysis, 10% (1/10) was a randomized trial, 10% (1/10) was a retrospective observational cohort study, and 10% (1/10) was a randomized clinical trial. Results: 80% of the articles found indicate that laser vaporization is an effective technique, while 20% mention that it is equally as effective as transurethral resection of the prostate, though they suggest continued patient evaluation at hospital discharge. Conclusion: Laser vaporization is more effective than transurethral resection of the prostate because it reduces hospital stay by 70%, bleeding by 80%, catheterization time by 80%, the need for blood transfusion by 70%, and pain by 70% in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of laser vaporization technique versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2017-12-03) Guzmán Rodríguez, Fiorella; Montesinos Benites, Stefanie Pamela; Matta Solis, Hernán Hugo
Objective: To evaluate the evidence on the efficacy of laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review that synthesizes the results of multiple primary studies. The sample is based on a review of 10 scientific articles published in the scientific databases LILACS, SCIELO, LIPECS, EPISTEMONIKOS, and the Cochrane Review, with the primary focus on the efficacy of laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients. Among the 10 pieces of evidence, 40% (4/10) were systematic reviews, 20% (2/10) were randomized prospective studies, 10% (1/10) was a meta-analysis, 10% (1/10) was a randomized trial, 10% (1/10) was a retrospective observational cohort study, and 10% (1/10) was a randomized clinical trial. Results: 80% of the articles found indicate that laser vaporization is an effective technique, while 20% mention that it is equally as effective as transurethral resection of the prostate, though they suggest continued patient evaluation at hospital discharge. Conclusion: Laser vaporization is more effective than transurethral resection of the prostate because it reduces hospital stay by 70%, bleeding by 80%, catheterization time by 80%, the need for blood transfusion by 70%, and pain by 70% in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly patients.
Acceso abierto
Effectiveness of open prostatectomy versus transurethral resection in patients post-operative for benign prostatic hyperplasia
(Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener, 2018-11-04) Yruri Puma, Madeleyne Karen; Quispe Estofanero, Friney Margoth; Calsin Pacompia, Wilmer
Summary Materials and Methods: the type of research was quantitative, the study design was a systematic review, the sample was 10 published scientific articles. To evaluate each of the articles, the grade method was used, which evaluated the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation. Results: 100% of the articles, 10% correspond to Iran, South Korea, Nigeria, Pakistan, 20% to China and 40% to India, in relation to the study designs, 40% correspond to essay clinical, 30% longitudinal, 20% retrospective and 10% cases and control. Conclusions: the present study concludes that rtup is 50% effective, especially for prostate surgeries weighing less than 70 grams. being better in terms of operating time, fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospitalization time since it is minimally invasive surgery, while 20% is better for open surgery for prostates of greater volume and weight since these had fewer postoperative complications in the short term. term and 30% there were no significant differences both intraoperatively in terms of its effectiveness and safety and also in the long term.